Topic Tags:
0 Comments

Waugh Turned Upside-Down

Hal G.P. Colebatch

Dec 07 2008

5 mins

Brideshead Revisited is the most dishonest film I have seen for a long time. The panning it has received by other critics despite its pretty scenery gives me hope for the state of our culture.

I will declare my own religious position first: I am not a Catholic and regard myself as a non-denominational Christian. Having said that, let me turn to the overarching fault of the film: it traduces the intentions of the novel’s author, Evelyn Waugh.

Waugh believed faith, specifically Catholicism, apart from offering Eternal Salvation, was the only solution, admittedly sometimes a difficult one, to the agonies of being human in a fallen world. In the film, however, Catholicism and faith in the wider sense are portrayed not as the solution but as the problem.

A major theme of the book is that, by the workings of Divine Grace, Salvation is offered to all, including even such improbable subjects as the unlovely idle rich family of Marchmain and the cynical, unbelieving, fashionably fraudulent artist Charles Ryder, who narrates the story. There is almost nothing of this in the film.

While the deathbed return to faith of Lord Marchmain is the obvious climax of the book, the second, and in its way more moving, culmination is the revelation on the last pages that Ryder, as a hard-bitten, middle-aged army captain in the grey, desolate world of 1944, now also kneels and prays in the chapel where the altar-lamp is “burning anew among the old stones”.

In the film there is no hint of Ryder’s final conversion, except that, when he enters the chapel where a candle is burning, he refrains, apparently on second thoughts, from pinching it out, perhaps for no more spiritual reason than because he doesn’t want to burn his fingers. He then fades away without a word, whereas in the book the sadness of the preceding story is set aside by the final consoling soliloquy and affirmation of Faith. Ryder’s introductions to the practical worldly goodness of Catholicism—the monk at the Moroccan hospital and the work done by Cordelia for refugees—do not feature.

All this adds up to a radical distortion of the author’s intentions: the work of one of the greatest Catholic novelists of the twentieth century has been turned into something very close to an anti-Catholic tract. Both Catholics and non-Catholics have some good lines in the book and the 1981 television adaptation, but none in the film: instead of eloquent dialogue there is waffle and pseudo-mysticism. “Guilt” is evoked as a major theme, which again is not exactly the case in the book. The scriptwriters seem compelled to try to improve on Evelyn Waugh’s lines, a bad as well as an impudent idea.

In the fine television adaptation, which followed the book faithfully, Claire Bloom was a charming, subtle monster as the controlling, possessive Lady Marchmain. In the film, reflecting its general artistic crudity, Emma Thompson, looking well past her use-by date as a charmer and with a gruesome parody of an upper-class accent, is a crude monster, and her control-freakery is seen as emanating entirely from Catholicism.

Her son Sebastian is shown as driven to alcoholism by religious guilt implanted by his mother and by thwarted homosexual love for Charles Ryder after Charles shows he prefers Sebastian’s sister Julia. Neither of these themes is to be found in the book, where Sebastian’s problem was that after his Arcadian childhood, he was unable to face being adult, maimed by having no dignity or will-power, a quite different matter.

Unlike the television series, he comes across as rodent-like rather than tragic, and there is nothing to suggest why Charles should have liked him anyway. Whether there was a sexual relationship between Charles and Sebastian at all is not spelt out in the book.

The catalyst of Sebastian’s final worldly ruin in the book, the death of the German Kurt in a concentration camp, is not mentioned at all, and his final apparently incongruous finding of salvation and peace as a humble porter is glossed over in a line. Further, it is reported that he is a porter, not, as in the book, in a monastery, but in a hospital. In the book, Sebastian’s life in the monastery and the kindness of the monks in taking him in, when there is literally no refuge in the world for him, is described in detail—the abbot, a “grim old Dutchman” from an African mission, recognises holiness in him. The different word is significant in the context, and the only reason the word was changed can have been to denigrate the idea of the church in general.

Anthony Blanche, an important character, is seen only in a couple of brief and virtually pointless scenes. He is hardly the cynical, outrageously camp, witty and perceptive commentator on the follies of the others which made him a star of the television series, nor is he shown in his last decline when the inadequacies of his wit, cynicism and perception are shown in a pitiless light.

Ryder’s character is also distorted. He is not intended in the book to be a ruthless social climber overcome by the glamour and wealth of the upper class. He is seduced by a more subtle numen. His father has a large London house with servants, and Charles is perfectly schooled in correct behaviour and dress when moving in high circles. Unlike, say, Patrick Dennis’s Tony, he would never commit a faux pas at a house party, or try too hard to impress, and though not in the Marchmains’ league of wealth is one of the upper middle class at least.

There is no trace of another theme which occurs not only in Brideshead but in probably all Waugh’s major novels: that as a result of the Reformation the English upper classes, divorced from an authentic fons, gradually over the centuries lost their purpose (with the degenerate aristocracy of the Bollinger Club in Decline and Fall, and the noblemen of ancient and sonorous title working as gossip columnists in Vile Bodies).

It was probably impossible to compress as long, complex and subtle a book as Brideshead Revisited into a film. A better course of action would have been not to have tried. Go back to the book or the television series.

Comments

Join the Conversation

Already a member?

What to read next

  • Letters: Authentic Art and the Disgrace of Wilgie Mia

    Madam: Archbishop Fisher (July-August 2024) does not resist the attacks on his church by the political, social or scientific atheists and those who insist on not being told what to do.

    Aug 29 2024

    6 mins

  • Aboriginal Culture is Young, Not Ancient

    To claim Aborigines have the world's oldest continuous culture is to misunderstand the meaning of culture, which continuously changes over time and location. For a culture not to change over time would be a reproach and certainly not a cause for celebration, for it would indicate that there had been no capacity to adapt. Clearly this has not been the case

    Aug 20 2024

    23 mins

  • Pennies for the Shark

    A friend and longtime supporter of Quadrant, Clive James sent us a poem in 2010, which we published in our December issue. Like the Taronga Park Aquarium he recalls in its 'mocked-up sandstone cave' it's not to be forgotten

    Aug 16 2024

    2 mins