Why is it not open to contend that it is preferable for Australia’s elected legislators to decide issues, such as so-called 'hate speech' matters, rather than substantive law-making decisions being dictated directly by international bureaucrats or indirectly by courts and tribunals?

Is it mere ignorance that sees Australian journalists in the US providing only the most superficial coverage of the post-election contretemps between Trump's legal team and the various Democrat-run states where voting and counting, to put it mildly, was deeply suspect? We are poorly served by such reporters but, alas, it seems they are only kind there is