Neo-Feudalists and Dismantlers

SIR: The European media sighs with relief as the nationalist candidate for the presidency in Austria garners a mere 48 per cent of the vote, thereby losing the contest to a Green with globalist affinities. In London’s west, the Lib-Dems congratulate themselves and their comeback is mooted on the strength of an anti-Brexit protest vote from well-off “I’m-alright-Jack” progressives who voted overwhelmingly for Remain. In Italy, a referendum on the emasculation of its democratic system of government is rejected by about two thirds of the voters.

The polarisation of electorates in most of the Western democracies is obvious. The division is not based on the now defunct Left–Right dichotomy, but counts supporters of democracy and national sovereignty on one side and elitist globalist neo-feudalist followers on the other. It looks now as if a large minority of voters in western Europe are turning against democracy, swayed, perhaps, by the European media’s continuous vociferous attacks on the people’s growing anti-establishment sentiment. It’s fine for the people to have an opinion, apparently, but only if they support the progressives’ neo-feudal agenda, which is to use the Western democratic nation-states and their political, bureaucratic, economic, financial, legal and liberal social-democratic structures as a vehicle to usurp their systems of government and force their citizens into the globalist corporate neo-feudal straitjacket.

The game of governments in practically all Western democracies is to execute a corporate neo-feudal globalisation agenda come what may. In that they are supported by virtually all the mainstream media. Political debate in public forums is now largely a charade. Government pronouncements, promulgations, announcements, blandishments, assurances, utterances and so forth can now certainly be taken with the proverbial grain of salt, or dose of Epsom salts, or ignored altogether. Likewise all politicians and commentators who support, overtly or otherwise, the corporate globalist neo-feudalisation of the world cannot be believed, even if they happen to be right some of the time.

We have arrived at the point where people in positions of power can no longer be believed. There is now just a continuous backdrop of political prating to mask the true state of affairs. The incumbents are filling their pockets as fast they can, trying to stave off the day of reckoning as long as possible, and when the time comes to do a runner they will leave the scene to the neo-feudalist enforcers to bring this betrayal of Western democracy to its logical conclusion.

Jacob Jonker
Fern Tree, Tas

SIR: The subject of sovereignty over land is appalling. No one individual, religion or race is superior to any other. History should merely be seen as a series of alternate periods of land custodians, none of whom “own” the land, sea or other territory.

With contemporary environmental enlightenment we should all nurture and protect the land upon which we were born, not fight endlessly and futilely for the right of imaginary title. How many more wars, conflicts and suffering does the human race need until our mindset is finally on the right track?

Eldert Hoebee
Torrens Park, SA