The Parallel Ambitions of Menzies and Evatt: Part I
Professor Geoffrey Blainey has unsurprisingly favoured readers of Quadrant (October 2023) with a very informed review, “The Great Bitter Rivalry”, of a very informative book, Anne Henderson’s Menzies versus Evatt: The Great Rivalry of Australian Politics (Connor Court, 2023). I propose to cast a few shafts of light on their contributions.
Both authors traced the origins of Robert Gordon Menzies and Herbert Vere Evatt from modest provincial backgrounds in Victoria and New South Wales respectively through scholarships to outstanding degrees in Law and, in Evatt’s case, in Arts as well. I begin with the Engineers’ Case—their first encounter as barristers, I believe.
On May 24, 1920, Menzies, aged twenty-five, appeared before the High Court in Melbourne arguing that a trade union client be brought within the Constitution’s conciliation and arbitration power. Forty-six years later, Menzies recalled Starke J and Knox CJ asserting that his argument was nonsense, whereupon he…
We are encouraged to rely more and more on government officials to do for us what we could equally well do for ourselves—and, maybe more importantly, not to do what might help us solve our own problems.
Sep 08 2024
10 mins
If we imagine a metric called the Pinocchio Scale, which measures the number of lies told by a politician as a percentage of his or her overall public statements, our current prime minister (for want of a better description), Airbus Albo, has moved well into uncharted territory.
Sep 06 2024
5 mins
The Justice’s legal analysis is superficially plausible but, nevertheless, the judgment is woefully woke. This is because the law, even if it were argued that the Court correctly applied the law, is incompatible with the biological fact that there are two sexes.
Sep 01 2024
14 mins