Some Riots, the Left Kind, Don’t Distress the ABC at all

What a mystery! Pundit Laura Tingle on ABCTV’s 7.30 last night (January 11) showed 13 seconds of clippage from 1996 of a crowd surging towards Parliament House in Canberra. We got glimpses of blokes pushing and shoving at the doors and at police lines, and then half a dozen police and blokes wrestling inside the foyer. She explained, after bagging President Trump for allegedly inciting the Capitol Hill riots,[1] “It is not as if Australia has not witnessed its own physical attacks on its Parliament.” Cut to 1996 ACTU secretary Bill Kelty saying, “If they [LNCP] want to fight, if they want a war, we will have a full set.”

Tingle says that Kelty “rightly” feared a new Howard government would represent “an assault on union power”. The union anti-Howard campaign led to a rally at Parliament House “that turned ugly”. After our 13-second glimpse of the ugliness, Tingle lined up Howard plus Opposition Leader Kim Beazley later condemning the violence – although Beazley in fact had revved up the crowd at the time. With concerned frowns to suggest ABC gravitas, Tingle wrapped up her historical excursion thus: “But there is a difference between an assault from outside the system [What? The ACTU and the federal Opposition are outside the Australian system?] and one encouraged by the man [Trump] at its very heart.”

Tingle next incited the cancelling of inconvenient MHRs George Christensen (Nats) and Craig Kelly (Lib). This renewed campaign by the taxpayer-funded broadcaster is not actually my topic here but the 7.30 attack is so viciously deceptive and authoritarian that I feel obliged to set it out for you. Then I’ll get back to those mysterious 1996 clips about unionists invading our own Parliament.

Tingle starts with some journo asking PM Morrison , “Will you condemn conspiracy theories being promoted by members of your own government?” When Morrison defends free speech, Tingle pivots to what she calls “concerns” (whose concerns, exactly) about Craig Kelly and George Christensen’s “social media activities” which have been “peddling everything from misinformation about results of the US elections to dubious claims about COVID-19.” She finds it anomalous for the government to defend the pair’s free speech, when at the same time the government “is pushing for action against social media abuse as well as its earlier push against terrorist-related hate speech.” She then shows Treasurer Josh Frydenberg condemning “publishing of that sort of terrible content” – i.e. China faking pics of our troops cutting a kid’s throat. Nice comparisons, Tingle! Let’s censor and cancel Christensen and Kelly straight away!

The nominal ethics of 7.30  require, or so one would like to believe, that evidence be shown to viewers about how despicable the pair’s media posts have been. Tingle flashes up on the screen, for all of five seconds (at 13.55mins), four supposedly incriminating posts by the pair. No viewer has time to read them, and that’s the point. One Christensen post in fact refers to a real-time video showing an apparent Antifa provocateur breaking Capitol Hill windows and Trump supporters throwing him to the ground. See it for yourself here. Pity the ABC doesn’t show such clips. Christensen’s other post makes the valid point that Biden’s vote patterns defy normal statistical patterns and laws. As for Kelly, he writes in one post that invading the Capitol is “completely unacceptable and they should all be arrested.” So what’s Tingle’s problem? Kelly then asks, “Is this [Capitol fracas] a greater threat to democracy “than a social media giant censoring and shutting down the account of a democratically elected President?” Fair point. His other post quotes a peer-reviewed and randomised trial study about Betadine and COVID-19, and he puts in capitals, “BUT ALWAYS CONSULT WITH YOUR DOCTOR.”

Any 7.30 viewer with knowledge of history will spot the resemblance of this taxpayer-funded authoritarian deceit with its equivalent from Soviet era broadcasting from Moscow or the TV diet fed to East Germans by Walter Ulbrecht and Erich Honecker.

NOW back to 1996. They say history doesn’t necessarily repeat, but it does rhyme. And what a close rhyme there is between that mob invading Parliament House, Canberra on August 19, 1996, and the mob of mainly Trump supporters that broke into the Capitol last week.

Both incursions were indefensible: violent behaviour is bad, and worse when directed at any nation’s legislative chamber. Of the thousands of Australian “progressives” who stormed and looted our Parliament on that August 19, 1996, fewer than dozen were charged. I’m hanged if I can find out if any were convicted or fined, let alone jailed. On the other hand, I hope, like Craig Kelly, that all American demonstrators who committed offences in or around the Capitol get their legal desserts, and especially the Antifa thugs who ran false-flag operations there.

The Australian rioters and looters at Parliament were part of a national “cavalcade” to Canberra of some 25,000 unionists and supporters organised by the Australian Council of Trade Unions and backed by the Opposition, students peeved about their shrinking government stipends[2], Aboriginals by the hundreds peeved about reductions to their ATSIC money,[3] rent-a-ferals and drunken agitators.

Nurses, firefighters, and public servants earlier in the day were chanting, ‘What do we want, [Prime Minister] Howard’s head. How we gonna get it? Tear it off!’

Don’t imagine the rioting was just the scuffles shown by Laura Tingle. Weapons used by the rioters included rocks, sticks, cans, paint bombs, a sledge hammer, a wheel brace used to smash glass partitions, a steel shop-trolley, diluted acid, and most fearsome of all, Paul Kelly’s 794-page tome The End of Certainty, stolen from the gift shop and lobbed at the police lines like a mortar round. One rioter tried to trigger the fire sprinkler system with a lighter. Ninety police and Parliamentary security people were injured — lacerations, sprains, and head and eye injuries. At least a couple were hospitalised. Academic thesis-writer Luke Deer commented, “This was inevitable as two tightly packed groups of several hundred rammed against each other for nearly two hours.”[4]

The then-deputy opposition leader Gareth Evans afterwards described the protesters as “crazy, self-indulgent bastards” adding that “what happened yesterday was ugly, un-Australian, stupid and indefensible.”

Nurses treated about 40 of the injured, amid blood spatterings on the marble floor and walls, maybe rhyming with the famous first-aid scene in Gone With the Wind. The nurses were aided in their ministrations by Trish Worth (Liberal MHR, Adelaide) and a woman, probably with a nursing background, who had been showing off the Great Hall to her doubtless-bemused American guests.

The rioting was to the distant accompaniment of Solidarity Forever and the Internationale, sung by the ACTU choir at the official demo a little down the road.

Constable Rachel Benthein said the protesters she faced had violent motives: “Most of those involved in the assault weren’t there to demonstrate against John Howard — they were there to cause destruction and, on the second day, to have a conflict with police.” Constable Corey Heldon was part of the police group swept away by the initial charge toward Parliament House: “We ended up against the wrong side of the front doors. The mood was very aggressive, very angry. I’ve never seen anything like it … They tried to pull me into the crowd but I was pulled back by fellow officers, otherwise I might have been swallowed up by the crowd.”

A female officer was allegedly abused and kicked on the ground. Another female officer collapsed as she was crushed between the wall of protesters and police. A security officer also said that at least two female protesters collapsed in the crush. One was passed over the police lines, the other over the protesters.

ACTU Secretary Bill Kelty said the Cavalcade was ‘the most successful rally in the history of this country in Canberra’. According to Deer in his thesis, Kelty did not have a detailed knowledge of the events when he made his comments.

The battle was a day before the Howard government brought down its annual budget in a session targeting industrial relations changes. The union armies’ transport included a Sydney train re-christened the “Spirit of Protest” — a half-witty play on the venerable Spirit of Progress — and 47 buses just for NSW members of the AMWU.

The rioters, including a high proportion of women,[5] were led by full-time paid union organisers, as named and depicted later in the Sydney Morning Herald’s front page. As if that heinous assault on our most sacred democratic institution the Parliament were not enough, Aboriginal activists rioted further the following day at Old Parliament House. If you were an adult in 1996, but can’t recall those twin riots, I’m not surprised because bad behaviour by leftists and protected classes goes straight down the media’s memory hole. The 7.30 report last night was an exception, driven, I’d say, by the need for some action footage.

On that evening in 1996, ABC TV news held its nose as it pretended to report the vandalism and violence by its political mates. Of that 4.40 minutes coverage, their ABC tribe was  more preoccupied with disputing the newly-elected Howard’s policies, and petitions against the policies, than describing the trashing of our billion-dollar democratic edifice and injuring of 90 police and guards. As the ABC’s then news pundit Jim Middleton put it mildly, “It was the demonstration that got away … the Opposition’s concern is that today’s wild scenes have played into the government’s hands, diminishing broader public concern about tomorrow’s axe-wielding budget.” ACTU President Jennie George was quoted, “I regret anything that has occurred but I certainly don’t bear the responsibility for it. Thank you.” Contrast that with the ABC TV’s rabid reporting last week of the Capitol violence, preceded by an ABC placard, “Day of Shame.”

After the local riot, Senate President Margaret Reid told the House on August 20 1996 that the “disgraceful and totally unjustifiable” ugly and violent display was “one of the most shameful in this nation’s political history.” A peaceful demonstration around Parliament against industrial relations changes had been authorised, with the ACTU taking responsibility for its orderliness.

The protest rally remained peaceful until about 12.20 p.m., when a separate group of marchers entered the parliamentary precincts. This group refused to accept police direction, forced a breach in police lines and ran towards the main front entrance of Parliament House. Unfortunately, it was apparent that some of these demonstrators were affected by alcohol. This group was supported by participants from the more general demonstration who were incited to join those involved in riotous conduct by a speaker from the official platform.

Police formed a protective line along the perimeter of the Great Verandah which was subsequently forced back to the main doors. The police line was withdrawn from this area due to the level of violence being experienced by officers, and was redeployed to an area inside the front doors in support of parliamentary security personnel. This deployment stabilised the situation for a short period.

However, demonstrators using increasing force broke through the first line of doors. Once inside this area, demonstrators used weapons, including a large hammer, a wheel brace, a steel trolley and a stanchion torn from the external doors to break open the internal doors. Simultaneously, a second group of demonstrators used other weapons to break into the Parliament House shop, but were held at the internal doors.

The shop was ransacked by demonstrators and major damage was caused by persons who subsequently occupied the area. After some two hours, the demonstrators were finally repelled from Parliament House and driven back onto the forecourt area and, shortly afterwards, they dispersed. In addition to the events which took place at the front entrance to the building, incidents also occurred on the Members Terrace, the roof of the Great Verandah and the Queens Terrace.

There were 197 Australian Federal Police on duty at the start of the demonstration, in addition to the Australian Protective Service officers and parliamentary security personnel. A further 60 Australian Federal Police reinforcements were called out under established contingency plans.

The outrageous events which took place yesterday resulted in not only financial but, more importantly and lamentably, human costs. So far about 90 personnel have reported injuries—including lacerations, sprains, and head and eye injuries. I understand one person required hospitalisation.

An initial indicative estimate of the damage to the forecourt and the foyer is up to $75,000. The full extent of looting and criminal damage which resulted from the occupation of the Parliament House shop has yet to be determined.

Finally, I want to apologise most sincerely to the Australian people and those from overseas who were visiting Parliament House and were unfortunately involved, inconvenienced, frightened or shocked in any way by this deplorable incident. To them I say: what you witnessed here yesterday is not typical of Australia or Australians. And I believe I speak for all my colleagues when I say: we hope and pray it never will be.

Local Trots and ferals were unimpressed by such sentiments. One wrote in a feature in Marxist Left Review: “As long as capitalism exists, the exploited and the oppressed will fight back in one way or another. Riots will not go away. They are an elemental form of revolt that needs to be supported by all those who hate the current rotten system.”

When Jennie George of the ACTU was asked by Nine’s Sunday TV show about allegations that union organisers, “paid by the union movement”, participated in the riot, she claimed they ‘were on their own’. Deer concludes, “The effect of news footage and reports of Jennie George’s concerns about the riot reinforced the view that the Government was correct in its condemnation of the ACTU and the labour movement generally.” But his own view is, “The ACTU chose to condemn the rioters, rather than the Government for creating the situation.” Two years later, Ms George was gonged as one of Australia’s “100 living treasures”.[6] She was parachuted into a safe seat (Throsby NSW) in 2001 and got her AO in 2013.

Deer in his 1998 Honors thesis called the riots “the most forceful physical attack on the Federal Parliament in Australian history.” He was then at the ANU Political Science Department. Despite some of his Marxist-theory pontificating, one can get from him many gems of fact about the affray.[7] Deer makes the fine distinction that the attack was not against the country’s key democratic institution, the Parliament; but just against the building which housed the Government (President Trump ought to adopt this line). He relates how the first column on the Commonwealth Avenue ramp was led by a “prominent Aboriginal land campaigner” and his contingent, followed by the CFMEU and students.[8]  

Against the authorised plan, they moved in towards the Parliament against riot police opposition. “At that point ACT CPSU Secretary, Catherine Garvan [Community and Public Sector Union], called out on the public address system on the main stage that the police were trying to block the Aboriginal protesters from reaching the main demonstration and started a chant to ‘Let them through’. Protesters from the main rally began to stream towards the point of conflict.”

The police had left the Parliament forecourt vulnerable and backed off to protect the entrance. Think Isandlwana and the Zulu hordes, as the police retreated further to the redoubt behind the main doors. Deer writes:

Many more demonstrators continued to arrive from the main rally. Protesters forced open the first set of main doors and the police retreated inside the foyer of the building where they attempted to reinforce the second set of doors…This march of several thousands proceeded to join what seemed to be the main demonstration on the forecourt. One  journalist called it ‘The unstoppable passing parade’.

Deer doesn’t buy the story that the rioters were just a small minority vis a vis a peaceful 20,000-plus unionists. “Indeed several thousand people, if not the majority of the rally, appear to have participated in this activity…At least 2000 protesters were actively involved in pushing against police lines or directly supporting the act. Thousands of other demonstrators also filled the forecourt and supported the hoisting of banners and flags on the building.”

He writes that for most of the time demonstrators were separated from police by heavily reinforced steel and glass doors. They tried to force the doors with their bodies. Later they used a trolley from the Parliament House Shop to force open five of the main doors. These gaps were soon filled by police with riot shields. Police attempted to make arrests and protesters tried to break the police line. Punches were exchanged. A number of demonstrators “crowd surfed” over the police line, spurred on by huge cheers from the rioters, but they were quickly arrested by police.

Some demonstrators entered the Parliament House Shop by smashing its glass doors with a wheel brace. They looted teaspoons, tea towels, books and other  memorabilia. Some rioters demurred. “It would be wrong to suggest that material gain was the main or even a significant factor explaining the riot,” Deer writes.

An empty beer can from the scene allegedly bore a sticker which said “Time to f**k the system that’s been f***ing us”. The sticker also invited the drinker to throw the can at “anyone who represents the system” and featured a picture of John Howard with an axe buried in his head, “The best cut of all”. Deer quotes a facetious Canberra Times journo, Ian Warden, “There were huge cheers as [an effigy of Liberal minister Amanda] Vanstone caught on fire. An angry young man emerged from the cheering crowd to smash in her smoking wire and paper skull again and again with the full force of his skateboard.”

Deer says that the rally organisers at the official platform (a big truck) seemed oblivious to the riot just a few hundred metres away. Speakers included the Leader of the ALP Opposition, Kim Beazley, and ACTU President, Jennie George chaired proceedings. Beazley told the baying crowd how the Coalition ‘hated’ workers, the unemployed, pensioners, students and Aboriginal people. Strangely, the ABC at the time didn’t feel that was incitement. Jennie George said that workers were “relying on Labor and the minor parties to defend their rights by defeating the Government’s proposals in the Senate”. Each time George mentioned ‘defeating’ she was greeted with huge cheers. Deer wrote, George’s message to the minor party senators was that ‘the Australian community will support you in your efforts to defeat this legislation’. 

Interrupting the official speeches, Davie Thomason, an Adelaide CFMEU organiser, climbed onto the stage and with bloodied face demanded to speak. Shaking a captured police riot shield, he said: “Brothers and sisters, 100 of us have got into our House. And look what we got from the coppers. And we have to remember it’s going to be a long haul but these people up here will never defeat us … Workers, united, will never be defeated.”

Not all ALP federal politicians rushed diplomatically to condemn the onslaught. Deer writes, “Police allege that ALP Senator Rosemary Crowley was in the crowd twenty metres from the doors on the August 19, ‘yelling that it was everyone’s Parliament House and that everyone should be let in. If people had placards they could just pass them through the security machine and take them inside’. Senator Crowley denied the allegations. The other exception was the Western Australian Greens Senator, Dee Margetts, who suggested that the riot had become a ‘law and order’ issue “which was being used to mask a more fundamental violence in society.”

Deer gives credence to evidence the riot was premeditated by ‘hardline Maoists’ in the CFMEU.

They were joined by ‘troublemakers’ among the Aboriginal contingent. These were involved in the initial conflict, and in further violence at Old Parliament House the following day. Also jumping on the bandwagon were a range of political extremists – Trotskyist groups and anarchists. These three groups hijacked the event and caused the bulk of the destruction. Through their actions and encouragement these agitators managed to embroil a larger group of unsuspecting protesters in the riot. Combined they formed a violent mob.

One CFMEU official suggested that ‘insurgent student activists’ had ‘disguised themselves in union shirts and caps’. As mentioned, the Trump camp now is also alleging ‘false flag’ provocateurs.

A Canberra participant from Mount Bromlow NSW, explained (emphasis added):

I am appalled at the white-washing of the event as simple thuggery and the action of a minority of protesters. Everybody seems to be upset that the symbol of democracy, Parliament House, was challenged. But it was precisely because it was the seat of government that it was attacked … the busting of the main doors was both a symbolic and real challenge to the ivory tower of political power.

I hate to pick at old scabs, but “progressives” were at it again in 2012, this time involving a near assault on the Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott, who were at an Australia Day celebration at The Lodge restaurant, Canberra. Mainly-Aboriginal rioters besieged The Lodge posing a threat to break down the doors and endanger the politicians. Julia Gillard’s bodyguards and federal police had to literally carry her through a howling mob to safety (below). She lost a shoe on that trip, Evdokia Petrov-fashion, subsequently seized and brandished by rioters. Irony of ironies, the riot was instigated by a staffer in Julia Gillard’s own office, who intended only Abbott as the target. The staffer resigned forthwith, departing abruptly overseas for several years of media-free sojourn in UK and Europe before returning to well-paid employment as a Federal Labor apparatchik.[9]

I can hardly wait for Laura Tingle to re-use clips from that episode. Her commentary could go: “Prime Minister Gillard goes high while misogynist Tony Abbott looks at his watch. The Prime Minister’s remaining stylish shoe is by Manolo Blahnik.”

 Tony Thomas’s new book, Come To Think Of It – essays to tickle the brain, is available here as a book ($34.95) or an e-book ($14.95) 


[1] Notwithstanding that Trump told his supporters to remain peaceful: “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.” His full quote:

We’re going walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators, and congressmen and women. We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong… I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard … But we’re going to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones, because the strong ones don’t need any of our help, we’re going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country… So, let’s walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I want to thank you all. God bless you and God bless America. Thank you all for being here, this is incredible. Thank you very much. Thank you.

[2] The Coalition Minister for Education, Amanda Vanstone, noted sagely that ‘someone with a degree is foolish to reject a job at McDonalds’.

[3] One of the Howard Government’s first announcements after its election was that ATSIC would have its budget cut by $400 million

[4] This essay draws heavily on Deer’s material.

[5] Of those who broke into the building, five females were issued with civil orders for breaching the peace.

[6] This weird compilation is run by the National Trust (NSW).

[7] Samples of Deer at his worst:

Since the early 1970’s the industrialised core of international capitalism has experienced a period of protracted economic crisis characterised by an historical decline in growth rates, relative economic stagnation and mass unemployment … The actions of the rioters were not malicious, indiscriminate, or irrational. This is not to suggest that individuals did not ‘lose it’, nor that they were not destructive, rather that there were clear limits on the protesters’ behaviour … It is possible that [Prime Minister] Howard sensed he had provoked precisely the kind of backlash that he had sought to avoid…

 [9] Via Michael Smith: For some reason PM Gillard’s press chief John McTernan was uncooperative with those seeking to interview the much-travelled ex-staffer about his alleged role in the riot. “A man nobody has ever heard of, doing a job nobody knows what it is. It is not a story, that’s all I am saying. My staff are not stories. My former staff for f…ing sure aren’t stories. I think it is ridiculous. [The ex-staffer] is a private citizen, an Australian working abroad.”

7 thoughts on “Some Riots, the Left Kind, Don’t Distress the ABC at all

  • Phillip says:

    You’re at it again….you are just presenting the facts, the truth and reality based upon thorough investigative work!
    My goodness, how are the lobotomised darlings at ‘our ABC’ ever going to understand this.
    God forbid if this article landed on an ABC research/resource tool, like a Twitter tweet or a Facebook page, you’d be censored, doxed (I don’t know what that means but it sounds like the loss of ability to reproduce….), your car could be fire bombed (peacefully of course) and then you’d be accused of alleging the US Elections are operated by fraud.

    Excellent work.

  • PT says:

    The ABC are partisans, and barrickers. The fact lefties think they’re impartial speaks volumes.

  • Peter OBrien says:

    Thanks Tony, for reminding us just how bad this incident was.

  • Tony Thomas says:

    Thanks Phillip,”doxing” actually means publicising the home address and/or personal details or employment of someone, e.g. a conservative, to enable them and their family to be harassed or worse by ill-doers.

  • J Vernau says:

    I vainly searched the President’s words (see footnote 1) looking for alleged incitement. Then I realised that it is the “stolen election” claims—if not the entire Trump presidency—that constitute the “incitement”.
    It’s government by children.

  • padraic says:

    At the risk of being pedantic, I think the restaurant in the second incident was the Lobby. I had had a meal there at different times when visiting Canberra. It was another of those “largely peaceful demonstrations” so beloved of the ABC, not far from the “Aboriginal Embassy” – no secession implied there, of course.

  • lbloveday says:

    Tangential, but there has been discussion on Quadrant about Wikipedia recently. From Catallaxy Files:
    • Assassination of John F. Kennedy: 12,064 words, 180 footnotes.
    • General relativity: 20,549 words, 214 footnotes.
    • World War II: 24,672 words, 415 footnotes.
    • Jesus Christ: 25,735 words, 466 footnotes.
    • 2021 storming of the United States Capitol: 38,829 words, 631 footnotes.

Leave a Reply