Media

Lights, Camera … Democracy

That was some presidential election. And don’t forget the primaries, where each party selected its candidate for president, or Senate or Congress, or governors, all the way down to the local dog-catcher in full public view. Maddening and messy.

No doubt you thought I was reflecting on Sleepy Joe and Grumpy Trump. I was not. I was thinking of Xi Jinping, President of the Peoples Republic of China. I do not know who ran against Xi for president, let alone his ‘primary’, or any of the other contests for positions of power in the Peoples Republic of China.

The Peoples Republic of China, that pretender to the crown of leader of the world, holds nothing up to public scrutiny. As messy as the US election was, it was open, democratic and obsessively reported. Citizens had their say, and where there were disputes, the courts stood ready to apply the law, without fear or favour.

Think any of that happens in the Peoples Republic of China?

The US was built on its War of Independence and the Civil War, out of which was built one of the world’s finest liberal democracies. On the other hand, China was built on several thousand years of internecine warfare until, after the final war, in 1949, one solitary group survived, the Communist Party of China, and its enforcer, the millions-strong Peoples Liberation Army.

This is what worries me. Where do young ones, those not exposed to the Cold War between the West and communism, find out about the evils of Chinese communism and the system of government that rules the lives of 1.6 billion Chinese?  

The liberal democracies won the cold war only for a time. Now it’s back, and this time in Australia’s backyard. China is back as if COVID never happened. The West will climb out of the coronavirus recession ever so slowly, weighed down by climate change madness and identity politics – while the Chinese just literally roll over anyone who gets in their way.

How to prepare an unwitting younger generation, who know everything about the minor kerfuffles of liberal democracies, and little of the evils of communism?

Popular entertainment is one way, especially for a generation used to getting its views from television screens. House of Cards and The West Wing were each brilliant drama series that took the viewer deep into the darker recesses of liberal democracy. In House of Cards, a post-Margaret Thatcher Conservative Prime Minister, Francis Urquhart (Ian Richardson), throws a journalist from a balcony to her grisly death. The original television series first screened in 1990, at the end of the Cold War.

In The West Wing President Jed Bartlet (Martin Sheen) is a Democrat (of course) trying to save the world, messy but heroic. The television series first screened in 1999, when the Cold War was fading into the mists of time. And Australia has screened some of its own entertaining political dramas, Secret City, Total Control, and the more humorous Party Tricks.

As entertaining as these dramas were, they probably created unease about democracy in the minds of young ones. Popular drama makes it look as though democracies are pretty bad. And, if your university lecturer feeds you nothing more than post-modern bile, you could be forgiven for thinking that democracy is indeed bad. 

Unless, of course, you knew different. Unless, you knew how shocking communist systems were. There, throwing someone off a balcony is not a filmmaker’s fantasy, it is the reality. 

I have little faith that Hollywood will play a role in defence of democracy or lift the lid on communism. Hollywood looks as craven as ever. The report,  Made in Hollywood: Censored by Beijing published by the think tank Pen America, observes that Hollywood studios compete for a limited number of slots for foreign movies. “Getting into the quota, you don’t have a lot of control over that process. But you can cut out anything that would jeopardize your chances of being on the list.” Hollywood, woke as ever, will wilt if Chinese money comes in the door, just as it wilted on protecting women actors from powerful Hollywood moguls.

The difference in the new Cold War is that the institutions most susceptible to infiltration in the last war have succumbed to anti-liberal sentiment and, as a consequence, those too young to know that the alternative to their messy liberal democracy is deadly communism.

So, filmmakers of Australia, and the West, where are your creative geniuses? Turn your minds to drama and start talking to money interests about making television series to show the popular audience what the alternative is like. Why, you could them House of Mahjong and The East Wing!

Lyn Wesley is an Australian researcher and writer

7 comments
  • ianl

    >”In The West Wing President Jed Bartlet (Martin Sheen) is a Democrat (of course) trying to save the world, messy but heroic”

    For the brief 10 minutes or so that I could stand watching that silliness, I had the impression that it actually represented what the TV wokester moguls wished the Clinton presidency was like, as against the reality. Myth making …

  • Peter Marriott

    Good piece Lyn, just one point on the ‘without fear or favour’ comment. This depends very much on the conscience of the Judge I think. We’ve seen how unconscionable those who hate President have been over the last 4 years , never giving him a fair go, even before he got started in the White House, and keeping up a constant barrage of white anting almost 24/7 since ; but to his credit he soldiered on and got their economy steaming full speed ahead, which is good for Australia, until this Wuhan virus arrived. Now as I understand it their State Supreme courts have elected judges, I can only assume on Party tickets, so in Democrat States, bang goes their ‘without fear or favour’ credentials. The only court that seems to fare a bit better there is the overall big one, the US Supreme Cort with parliament scrutineered, appointed Judges, so I personally hope they can uncover whatever fraud has been enacted because if even half of what I’m reading is true, there has definitely been vote rigging, and why wouldn’t there be with the Trump haters over the top feelings, plus a computer generated voting booth system of all things in this day and age, if the way outside influences can get into and change things in my computer is anything to go by.

  • whitelaughter

    the general uselessness of the media is no surprise to anyone here. What has surprised and annoyed me for decades is the lack of a movie about the battle of Milvian Bridge – the defining engagement that won the Western Empire for Christianity. I’ve finally got my finger out and started writing a screen play to fill that gap, and hope other people will fill other gaps.

  • Peter Marriott

    whitelaughter. Good on you, it’s a wonderful subject alright, and should make good viewing ; I wish you every success with it.

  • whitelaughter

    thanks Peter

  • Doubting Thomas

    I think the fundamental problem in the US is that everything is political, from the dogcatcher to the President. At some point in their careers, all judges have depended on their political allegiances for their positions. It’s hard to imagine these people shedding those political loyalties as they move up through the court systems, and I doubt if any state Supreme Courts there see anything except through deeply partisan eyes. So the fact that Trump’s cases are being thrown out at state Supreme Court level was always predictable. It’s the real Supreme Court where he is working towards.

  • nfw

    What a load of rubbish. Does the author of this article know anything about the farce the Democrat Presidential primaries were? As for “Citizens had their say, and where there were disputes, the courts stood ready to apply the law, without fear or favour” ask how General Flynn how he felt about the Obama appointed judge who wouldn’t let the BS case against him be dropped. As for The West Wing and The House of Cards, they were fictional dramas, not real life.

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.