Guilt-edged chromosomes

American journalist and blogger Sarah Hoyt was summoned to her son’s school by an edu-ninny appalled that the six-year-old had written a poem hailing a female classmate for being “pretty” and having eyes “like stars”.  According to the ninny this was “sexual harassment” and, as he is a boy, his guilt was a given. Ms Hoyt hit the roof and saved one of her sons from sanction, but that was only her first experience of what misandrist feminism has wrought. She writes:

… Our younger son, a happy, gregarious child, who had some issues (he has sensory processing disorder. No, it’s not made up. Yes, it was causing him serious trouble in class as he moved to middle school, which was bigger and noisier) and a slight speech impediment, but never had trouble having friends or enjoying school. The incident in the playground three years before was well and truly forgotten (though I’ll note it was the same school).

Suddenly, he was being given detentions practically daily. We were told he was aggressive. We were told a lot of vague stuff that made no sense. Because the child is introverted and also one of those people who’ll fight his own battles, we couldn’t get sense out of him either.

It all came to a head when they called us – yes, saying they were about to call the police – because he had kissed a little girl against her will on the lunch line.

The problem was that while in the lunch line, he’d been talking to his Spanish teacher. Also, there were cameras in the lunchroom, filming every interaction.

We pointed this out. They said yes, but girls don’t lie about these things, so it must have happened another time. The words “we’ll sue you to your back teeth. I’ll make it my life’s mission to ruin everyone involved in this” were uttered. It was dropped.

But the incidents continued and escalated, and we became aware of what was happening though we only pieced the background of it together almost a year later.

The background was this: 18 girls, most of them children of the staff, had decided my son was – and I’ll use their term – “retarded” and therefore “dangerous.” (I’ll point out that the speech impediment was the ONLY reason they could even think so.) And they’d decided to make us remove him from the school/get the school to expel him by accusing him of “harassing them” …

What follows is appalling and should be read by every mother of a boy. Meanwhile, the war on boys and men proceeds nightly in Australia, where “public service” ads, like the one whose freeze-frame is reproduced above, promote the mad feminist view that the problem with boys and men is that they are, well, boys and men.

Sarah’s piece can (and should) be read via this link or the one below. The local incarnation of this insanity is beamed every night into your livingroom.

Read More