QED

The Rainbow Blackboard

rainbow paint IIAt the same time the Andrews government is removing religious instruction from the school curriculum there can be no doubt that it is pushing a radical cultural-left agenda about sexuality and gender on Victoria’s school children. 

This shouldn’t surprise, as Premier Andrews is a key member of the ALP’s Socialist-Left faction and Labor’s policy, taken to the 2014 election, states an incoming government must “improve the health and safety of same-sex attracted and gender-questioning (SSAGQ) students by ensuring schools and health services effectively address homophobia, including content of sexuality education”. While all accept that bullying and unfair discrimination are wrong, the reality is that what Premier Andrews supports is more about advocating a radical lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI) lifestyle than actually making schools safer. The Safe Schools Coalition program the Andrew’s government is making compulsory next year, while sold as an anti-bullying iniative, is more about indoctrinating children.

gender fairy coverSchool children are told that gender is fluid and limitless, that they can decide what they want to be.  The Gender Fairy storybook, designed for children as young as four, suggests being transgender is normal and it’s OK not to identify as male or female.

The Safe Schools Do Better booklet tells students that about 16% of children are same-sex attracted, gender-diverse, trans- or intersex, even though a random survey of over 19,000 Australian men and women discovered that 98% identified as heterosexual.

Worse, children are taught that anyone who suggests “normal” relationships involve men and women are to be condemned as “heteronormative”, “homophobic” and/or ss schools tips“transphobic”. At right, for instance, is Safe Schools Do Better’s advice on taking offence and reporting teachers perceived to have the “wrong” attitude.  Such are the concerns about the lack of objectivity and the fact that the Safe Schools material is not age appropriate that a recent review commissioned by the Commonwealth government called for significant changes. These included schools needing to get parental approval before teaching the program, which is not to be used in primary schools, and giving parents the right to opt-out.  As expected, in addition to making the Safe Schools program compulsory, Andrews has refused to have a word changed.

More recently, another school program — Building Respectful Relationships — is also causing controversy.  Part of the program asks students to read raunchy and provocative personal ads more suited to pornography sites and then to write their own (below, at left, is part of the teachers’ lesson plan. Notice the fourth bullet point, which suggests that there are “disadvantages” in accepting traditional family relationships as the norm). So much for the innocence of youth.

Parents, always their children’s primary carers, need to realise that what is happening in Victoria is not new, that the cultural Left has been pushing its radical agenda on schools for years. The Australian Education Union is the largest personal adsand most powerful teacher union in Australia and its 2001 Policy on Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender People argues that “homosexuality and bisexuality need to be normalised” in the school curriculum. The AEU also argues that it is wrong to believe heterosexual sex and relationships are “natural” or “normal”, and it condemns churches as “un-Christian” if they do not agree with the radical LGBTQI agenda.

The AEU’s 2003 policy goes further in demanding that “all staff must be in-serviced in homophobia and heterosexism” and “all curriculum must be written in non-heterosexist language”.  It is no surprise that “discussion of GLBT issues in a class situation should aim to be positive in its approach”.

The Australian Association for the Teaching of English has also been a long-time supporter of a cultural-left view of gender and sexuality.  In 1992 an academic in the English teachers journal described traditional approaches to literature as “bourgeois, patriarchal, ethnocentric” and argued they needed to be deconstructed and exposed. A second academic argued that the English classroom should be used to “elaborate alternative versions and styles of masculinity in attempting to move beyond an oppressive gender bind”.

The belief is that traditional fairy tales like Cinderella and Snow White unfairly enforce a heterosexist view because the happy ending involves the heroine marrying the prince. Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and Jane Austen’s Emma are also unsuitable, as they enforce “an oppressive binary structure for organising the social and cultural practices of adolescent boys and girls.”

The Victorian curriculum is not alone in making schools enforce a radical view of sexuality and gender.  The 2001, South Australia’s curriculum, under the heading Gender Equity, argued that gender is a “social construct” and  heterosexuality enforces unfair dominant power relations that must be deconstructed.

Parents might wonder why, at the same time the Andrews government wants to force its radical gender agenda on schools, it has banished religious instruction from the formal school curriculum. It’s clear where the government’s priorities lie.  Instead of a strong moral compass, the focus is on advocating a radical LGBTQI secular agenda.

Dr Kevin Donnelly is a Senior Research Fellow at the Australian Catholic University and author of Dumbing Down

7 comments
  • Jim Campbell

    Kevin Donnelly is right to highlight that, ‘Instead of a strong moral compass, the focus is on advocating a radical LGBTQI secular agenda.’
    May I suggest that there may also be longer term issues at stake as well as morals and secular agendas. In addition to Donnelly’s points readers may like to peruse a recent related article, ‘From Bullying to Genetics’.
    .

  • Lawrie Ayres

    The only recourse is for parents to take their children out of these queer schools. This one excess should see more kids in private and non-government schools. Daniels is extremely dangerous and very destructive of Victoria. They got what they asked for now let’s see if they can deal with it.

    Much as I despise Turnbull he could use the Andrews government as a template for what will happen to Australia if Shorten is elected. The same unions will be demanding the same outcomes.

    • [email protected]

      In the end you will be made to care and to comply. If too many people leave the corrupted public system then the government will just force this agenda onto private schools.

      You should also realise that there has been a couple of decades of this propaganda in the education system already. The majority of people under 25 now basically subscribe to all of this and polling shows that about 70% of 18 to 24 year old now vote Labor or the Greens. Malcolm Fraser and then John Howard did nothing at all to stem this tide and now we have Turnbull who is in the enemies camp.

  • Turtle of WA

    Well done Kevin. I like the way you posted the relevant source documents. Many teachers who should know better are being fooled by the ‘bullying’ and ‘mental health’ Trojan horses.

  • padraic

    I agree with Lawrie Ayres comments. Shorten has publicly backed these pathetic programs to the hilt. So much for Labor being for ‘working families’ any more. Claiming that the traditional approach to English teaching is “bourgeois, patriarchal and ethnocentric” is a bit rich considering that the promoters of this garbage are hardly people living under plastic sheeting in Belmore Park. I can’t see a problem with being ethnocentric when dealing with one’s own language in all it’s richness and beauty.

  • [email protected]

    The management of psycho – sexual problems is a difficult and challenging subject for the experts in this area of medicine. By experts I mean specialist paediatricians, psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers and so on. That is experts who have hands on experience in dealing with both the children and their parents.
    Merv Bendle writing in Quadrant Online [March 2nd 2016] states the principal author of the Safe Schools Program is a graduate of the University of Sussex with a BA(hons) and MA in Gender studies. According to Bendle there has been no input from medical or Scientific experts in the field of psych-sexual disorders. The input is from members of gender and social faculties and also those with a strong bias towards Marxist philosophy. There seems to be a paucity of evidence that the Safe Schools Program has been supported by properly conducted random clinical trials.
    Now I am sure that I would be accused of medicalising what is solely a social matter. That the Gay and Lesbian lifestyle is the norm and ideal for humanity. Further that hetero-sexuality is an aberration and so on.
    The fact is that LGBTI way of life is not the norm. The vast majority of people world-wide live in a family of mother, father, grandparents, uncles and aunts etc. and not in the undergraduate fantasy world imaged by the authors of Safe Schools.
    Now can anyone really imagine that after a few talks and videos and reading a few gloss pamphlets that teachers can be consider as trained ‘sex therapists.’ I fear such amateur therapists have the propensity of doing harm to susceptible children.
    Of course, on the other hand some children are remarkably tough and resilient to stupidity. Any teacher silly enough to suggest to adolescent boys imagine you have lost the your ‘willy’, may well give the teacher hell.

  • [email protected]

    The destruction of western civilisation is proceeding apace.

Post a comment