QED

The Devil in the Delusion

shaytanIt was the nineteenth-century French poet Charles Baudelaire who first remarked that “the devil’s best trick is to persuade you that he does not exist.” This maxim resonates when I think of ISIS. First, pairing the Devil and ISIS seems apropos as a general principle. But, second, ISIS has a disappearing trick too in its kitbag. In this case it works to persuade the ninnies in the West to think that terrorism will somehow disappear if only ISIS can be routed.

Almost all terrorist attacks these days are linked to the influence of ISIS. Ergo, where ISIS goes so does terrorism. Wrong, ninny, this is a non sequitur. The real instigator of terror existed long before ISIS and will exist long after ISIS is just a fetid memory.

I don’t care what anybody says about the vast amounts of money now being spent on education. Under the corrupting influence of political correctness, the general IQ and good old-fashioned common sense of people in the West is, and has been for some time, clearly plummeting. With a brave few exceptions, this is particularly evident among the political elite, academics, Christian church leaders, and those in the media.

Toeing the post-modern line, we sheep are meant to accept that Captain Cook ‘invaded’ Australia, presumably with cannons a-blazin’ against the well-fortified positions of the indigenous inhabitants; that gay marriage is only about equality; that ‘husbands and wives’ is an exclusionary concept; that all cultures are equally valuable (ahem, except our own); that those of European heritage are heirs to a history of bloodlust and exploitation; that bringing in millions of people with starkly different cultural values will produce a feel-good multicultural nirvana; that individuals can be whatever gender or ethnicity they would personally like to be; that ninety-seven per cent of climate scientists accept the alarmist global warming thesis (after all, in a post-modern world, a fiction repeated often enough will become true).

I could go on but I find it so mentally taxing and enervating that the apparition of death appears as a welcome release. But the debilitating effects of the above sophistries, all put together, will be as nothing if political correctness continues to obfuscate the blood-spattered trail between cries of Allahu Akbar and butchery.

The formation of ISIS (or ISIL as some know it), an extension of ISI (Islamic State of Iraq), was announced by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in April, 2013. The roots of ISI/ISIS can be traced to 1999 under al-Zarqawi (see, for example, The Complete Infidel’s Guide to ISIS by Robert Spencer). Its resurgence, post ‘The Surge’ of US troops in Iraq in 2007, occurred after President Obama withdrew the remaining US troops from Iraq in December 2011. Recall his peerlessly myopic pronouncement at the time: “We’re leaving behind a sovereign, stable, and self-reliant Iraq.”

Wikipedia provides a selective list of those Islamist terror attacks “that have received significant press coverage since 1980.” I am assuming that this source is reliable enough to draw broad conclusions. Eight such attacks are listed during the 1980s, 31 during the 1990s and 117 during the 2000s. There have so far been 247 attacks since the start of 2010, including the cruel and horrific attack in Lahore on 27 March.

A first thing to be clear about is that Islamic terrorist attacks – as defined – were trending up steeply before ISIS was on the scene. However, a second thing to concede is that the rate of attacks since the start of 2013 has accelerated. Almost half of the ‘selective’ attacks listed from 1980 have occurred since the start of 2013. Even though ISIS is not directly implicated in all of them, it is evident, I think, that its influence is material.

It therefore seems reasonable enough to conclude that defeating ISIS will likely lead to a diminution in terrorist attacks; at least for a time. That is an essential reason to rid the world of it, as is reducing refugee flows and preventing atrocities wherever it sets up camp. But, it would be foolish to mistake a symptom for the cause. ISIS is a symptom. Islam is the cause.

Australian National Security currently lists twenty terrorist organisations, all but one of which — the Kurdish PKK – is Islamist in character. All claim to draw imprimatur from their religion. A child could connect the dots; but evidently not those whose common sense has been devoured by political correctness.

For the sheer counter-cultural fun of it, imagine – however impossible it seems – that common sense undergoes a revival among our leading citizens. Take Mr Turnbull* as a case in point. Here he is, Churchill-like, standing by the side of President Trump in the White House Rose Garden early next year.

“It seems inevitable, once ISIS is gone, that its progeny will emerge perhaps from out of one of its extant Islamic terrorist cousins. Defeating ISIS is not like defeating Nazi Germany. Nazism was just an invention of Adolf Hitler and his evil cohorts. Islam is an immutable invention of Allah and his Messenger. There is a big difference which only to our peril can we ignore.” Trump looks at Turnbull approvingly and nods in agreement. Turnbull continues buoyed by Trump’s evident approval.

“There is religion and then there is religion. Thuggees in India apparently considered themselves related to a goddess, but that didn’t stop the British from putting a stop to them. You simply can’t have 1.6 billion people owing allegiance to a religion which has an immutable scripture giving imprimatur to supremacism, intolerance, discrimination and violence. It is just not acceptable. Muslims have to be persuaded to leave this pernicious creed behind and live more enlightened lives. Nothing else will do! Islam cannot be reformed, and that is the irreducible fact of it.”

And pigs might fly – as they and dogs, not to mention various categories of humans, would have to do to escape their fate, if those paying not the least homage to political correctness were ever to take over.

(editor’s note: Mr Turnbull’s turn in the Rose Garden will strike many as a good deal less likely today, considering the latest poll.)

 

10 comments
  • [email protected]

    Very much in agreement that Australians who have drifted into the Post-modern malaise are being easily duped by resurgent Mohammedanism. But the alternative to acquiescing to our slow demise involves painful individual awakening. It requires people to admit they have not been careful and cautious and conservative when presented with the Utopian concept of multiculturalism, a deceitful concept which is proving as destabilising to countries as international communism was to the world.Christian churches that think their future is best assured by friendship with the Left and its open borders policy will have to abandon the half-hearted embrace of the secular elites and admit they have not followed their founder’s advice to be as ‘wise as serpents’.

    • pgang

      Amen to that

  • [email protected]

    An excellent article, one of the best ever by the author. The fourth paragraph is particularly hard hitting, made even more potent by the fifth.

    The life-and-death struggle between Islam and the rest of the world, more particularly Christianity, has been on-going since the rise of Islam 1400 years ago, only the intensity of it varied over that time. As things stand, Islam has thrown down the gauntlet and once again declared its original intention of wiping out every other theology and philosophy as well as atheism, using unrestrained force, atrocity, cruelty, trickery, fair or foul. They have declared war on us, war to the bitter end, with no possibility of compromise. Bewilderingly, no matter how obviously and unmistakably they herald their intent, the leadership, as well as much of the lay population of the non-islamic world simply refuse to heed it. Enough to send a sane person round the bend!

  • Tezza

    Nice essay. Mr Turnbull’s imagined future speech sounds particularly realistic with its malapropism of ‘prodigy’ for ‘progeny’.

    • [email protected]

      Nice pick up Tezza. Ah, if only I could claim it was intentional. Peter

    • Roger Franklin

      Don’t blame peter, Tezza. It was my doing. — roger

      • [email protected]

        Hmm, Nice gesture Roger. I know you stoically accept editorial accountability; but, in case there is any doubt, it was my slip to begin with. Peter

  • gardner.peter.d

    I spend many hours on the internet in search of any organisation whose public face speaks with common sense. They are few and far between. It can be totally dispiriting. Quadrant is an oasis in a desert of public debate and news.

  • pgang

    An excellent summary of the outcomes of postmodernism Peter. I would add, ‘that we may believe anything we like about the human race, as long as it’s Darwinian evolution; that because humanity has no intrinsic value, some of us are more equal than others.’

  • ian.macdougall

    A very good piece, Peter.
    Readers might also like “Multiculturalism Rots Brains”: An Interview With Maryam Namazie
    The Iranian dissident communist gets scathing about Islamism and the Left…
    .
    https://www.currentaffairs.org/2016/03/multiculturalism-rots-brains-an-interview-with-maryam-namazie

Post a comment