Sign In
0 Items (
Search
Comments (12)
“If you look a little closer, the scene becomes a horror show. Clumps of hair and fragments of bone poke grotesquely out of the ditch. It is estimated that almost 80 women are buried in this mass grave, aged between 40 and 80-years-old. The bodies are of Yazidi women, murdered by Islamic State butchers.” — UK Telegraph
They were butchered because they were non-Muslims and considered too old to be used for sex or sold as sexual slaves by Islamic State. Meanwhile, their daughters and younger sisters were raped, often many times a day. And then, like other stolen loot and war booty, they were listed on social media for sale. The going price was nominal, frequently no more than a packet of cigarettes, and the Islamic State thugs that bought them were promised a great bargain. “Brothers,” proclaimed one such ad, “you won’t be disappointed!”
Like the Christians and Jews throughout the Middle East, the Yazidi people are treated as infidels, devil-worshippers, polytheists and non-persons, lacking any rights or even any status as human beings. Instead, they are being exterminated and subjected to ethnic cleansing. Masses of people whose faith and residence in their ancestral homelands goes back 2000 years are being systematically expunged from the earth.
But don’t expect that they will receive any help from Barak Obama — or Malcolm Turnbull, who thinks, according to his publicist, Mark Kenny, in the Fairfax press, that “unpalatable types including hardliners” can be persuaded to strike a deal in, as Australia’s leader explains it, “a spirit of compromise and in a spirit of pragmatism”. The only time a plainly bored and disinterested Obama showed any emotion at his G20 press conference in Turkey was when it was suggested he show some special consideration for non-Muslims in terms of offering them refuge from the monstrous forces that want to kill, rape, and enslave them. As The Age reports
During an hour-long press conference in Turkey in which he repeatedly forced to defend his administration’s strategy to counter the threat from IS, the only time Mr Obama appeared angry was when he rejected these suggestions.
According to Obama, it is Muslims who face the greatest threat in the Middle-East — and Muslims who should be re-settled in America and the West. “We don’t discriminate against people because of their faith,” proclaimed Obama, indicating that the Yazidi, Christians, and other non-Muslims being killed or enslaved are to be treated no different than their persecutors.
Islamic State has made no secret of its attitude or intentions regarding these non-Muslim people, all of whose religions pre-dates Islam by many centuries. Christians and Jews have been targeted for decades, but IS shifted systematic persecution into a higher gear in February when it lined up 21 Coptic Christians on the beach at Tripoli (below) and beheaded them for a propaganda video to send “a message signed with blood to the nation of the cross”, that message being “we are coming to destroy Christians everywhere”.
As for the unfortunate and harmless Yazidi, the extreme hatred of ISIS towards them became clear in August, 2014, when the Islamists overran their territory in Sinjar and began a program of extermination that even the United Nations admitted was genocide. Thousands died, many from bullets to the back of the head — a technique the Nazis’ Einsatzgruppen would have admired for its speed, economy and efficiency. Other Yazidis were simply thrown off cliffs while their mothers, wives and daughters were passed around to be raped.
Given such systematic and explicit programs of atrocity, it is grotesque in the extreme to claim that it is somehow unfair or discriminatory for Australia to give priority to non-Muslim refugees from Syria, as the ABC and others have done.
When this current conflict is over it will be possible for Muslims to return to their homes, as many Lebanese did after their civil war in the 1970s. No such possibility will ever exist for the Yazidis or Syria’s Christians. They now have no prospects in what were once their ancestral homelands. If not given refuge elsewhere they will be doomed.
If Australia does not step up to the mark and reach out to these people we will make ourselves party to the systematic genocide and ethnic cleansing being carried out by Islamic State and the Muslim nations that are its paymasters and mentors.
I had to laugh about Jackie Lambie. She said muslims and the Grand Mufti needed security tags on their ankles and that “Australians are sick and tired of it and want these people to integrate”. Large, silent, collective cheers would have been made – and I don’t usually like Lambie at all. You’d have to say she’s got guts and won’t be on the invitation list to the inner city basket-weaver dinner parties any time soon!!!
She’s gone much further than most of that treasonous lot.
But integration? No, just leave! We’re beyond integration, clearly.
They have their own society in which they can be what they want to be.
Keep the world diverse, don’t turn every Western country (and only Western countries) into a mini UN. Ever tried mixing the colours of a painting palette? The result is some dirty shade of brown resembling baby poo.
The descendants of the founders of all Western societies have a right to have their culture and society free from the molestations of middle-eastern cultures.
It is most unfortunate that the patriotic pronouncements of the likes of Jackie Lambie and Pauline Hanson get so much media exposure. While their heart is in the right place, their less-than-astute intellect renders their utterances fair game for the progressive bleeding hearts.
“Progressive”? Priceless!!!
Thank you MB for your persistence in progressing this cause of Western survival.
Australian has an immigration filter that selects people on a points system. So one can say it is a selective system and it gives preference to those with English and other useful skills which means they are more likely to integrate without being a drain on fellow Australians.
Why then would anyone object to screening refugees so that no more than 5% of them are followers of Mohammed because this 5% figure is even more than the proportion of the Australian population which would presently register as Mohammedan. Why in the first batch of the 12000 Syrian refugees do we see females wearing headscarves?
So how did the grand mufti get in? I’ve only heard him speak through an interpreter.
Obama has made another profound pronouncement today, in answer to Americans’ calls to shut down Islamic immigration: “we CAN’T discriminate”. Why is the so-called progressive Left so fond of verbs like, “can’t”, “must”, “Stop”, “shouldn’t”, “won’t”, “hate”, “celebrate”,”discriminate”, “share” ad nauseum?
Used to be “yes we can”.
I’m heartily sick of these ‘people’, and had it to the back teeth with the loony left in this country. I really think we’re going to have to hand Pauline Hanson the reins for a while. She’ll give the left the kicking it so richly deserves, and stop this nonsense of importing more of these sub-humans into Australia.
I will vote for her if she puts her hand up again. And you buffoons at the ABC can call me any names under the sun.
Merv,
You are whistling in space and nobody can hear you. Every time I see or hear Malcolm the vision of Alice’s smirking Cheshire Cat inevitably comes to mind. Having the one tracked mind of replacing Abbott, the Cat had no time to spare to think about what should come next. In Scottish parlance Malcolm Balliol is a ‘Toom Tabard” (an empty suit) and when he fades away all he will leave behind is his empty smirk. They want us dead and Malcolm says we need a political solution. They want us dead and Malcolm agrees to import more of them. They want us dead and Malcolm cannot say their name. They want us dead and Malcolm wonders what they mean by that. They want us dead.
Beginning with Fraser we have imported a flesh-eating virus that requires radical and unpleasant non-democratic, unprogressive surgery. We could always give them South Australia as nobody wants it anyway.
Saudi Arabia and North Korea will criticise us for it, but will take none of those we expel. So be it.
Unfortunately, I am dreaming until the first thing we expel is a large number of our current crop of politicians
I’ll have to repeat the Churchill speech on Islam, which, if anything, is truer today than it ever was:
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.
-What a great man.
Indeed. But what ails the Left that they are blind to the truth? Already, Malcolm is a disappointment.