Doomed Planet

The Nature of Things: Trees Shed Leaves, Coral Bleaches

Contrary to the incessant bleating of office-based Great Barrier Reef “experts” (who visit the Reef a couple of weeks in a year), the reported incidents of coral bleaching are nothing new, unusual or threatening. They are common natural event no more threatening than trees shedding their leaves with the changing seasons, or occasionally in response to a dry spell.

Some readily verifiable relevant facts:

1/ Tropical ocean waters are generally nutrient poor and the symbiotic algal cells which give corals their colours are living near the lower nutrient limits for healthy plant growth. Their metabolism is sensitive to temperature and to achieve high efficiency it is fine-tuned to an optimum temperature range of only few degrees. Different strains of the algae are optimised to the differing seasonal temperatures and geographic regions.

2/ The strains of algae living in the tissues of corals change in accord with seasonal changes in water temperature. Such changes are usually gradual and the change in algae is not visually apparent.

3/ However, a more rapid change in temperature can result in the existing algal strain being expelled from the corals and appearing bleached. Such rapid changes in temperature are not rare.  Atmospheric cold fronts can result in sudden cooling. Likewise, calm periods lasting a week or more in warmer months can result in several degrees of warming near the surface when wave-driven mixing and water flows across shallow reefs fade away.

4/ If a temperature change is only brief, as in the wind returning after a calm period, the expelled algal strain may just be re-established.  If the change is seasonal, a new strain of algae may replace the previous one. Such recovery can be relatively quick. A few weeks after a bleaching event, corals usually appear normal again.

5/ Bleaching mostly affects shallow reef areas where it is also conspicuous. In deeper channels and on the edges of extensive shallow reef flats where tidal flow of warm water off shallow areas occurs, some beaching may extend a few metres deeper. Extensive reef areas at depths below about 10 metres are generally unaffected. The vulnerable shallow areas are also subject to occasional devastation from storms, floods or even just a good rain if it occurs when corals are exposed by a low tide.

6/ Bleaching attracts attention. But the surveys and news reports tend to ignore the rapid recovery a few weeks later. At the extremes, severe bleaching, like severe droughts on land, can result in extensive mortality. Fortunately, this is rare.

7/ The previous widespread bleaching event in 2017 was claimed to have reduced coral cover on the GBR by 50 per cent. However, the most recent survey, in 2021, found the highest level of coral cover ever recorded in the three and a half decades of the survey record. Corals do not grow that fast. They only grow a few centimetres in a year.  The previous claim of a 50 per cent reduction in coral cover was grossly exaggerated. Most of the corals simply recovered.  

8/ It is also worth noting that the average sea surface temperatures on the GBR are a couple of degrees cooler than they are in the Coral Triangle area of northern Indonesia and the southern Philippines where coral reefs reach a peak of biodiversity found anywhere on Earth.

9/ It is further worth noting that there is no sound evidence of increasing warming on the GBR over the past century. The best temperature record we have from the region is from the Willis Island weather station. It shows no increase between monthly high temperature averages from 1930-1960 compared to 1990-2020.

10/ Numerous peer-reviewed studies from widespread reef areas clearly indicate that seasonal changes in the zooxanthellae in corals is normal and occasional sudden changes in temperature often result in varying degrees of temporary bleaching.

11/ Various other studies have also found that bleaching leaves growth rings in corals which can reveal the age, intensity and even the temperature of these events. These records show that bleaching has been a common occurrence over all time scales — from decades, to centuries, to millennia — and even to millions of years. There is also no evidence to indicate any statistically significant recent increase in the frequency or intensity of bleaching.

That we have only recently become aware of such things as bleaching events, mass spawnings, population blooms, and internal waves bringing surges of cold, deep, nutrient-rich water onto steep outer reefs is not because these are unprecedented. The discovery in the past few decades of hundreds of species of reef creatures that were new to science is likewise not because they did not exist for eons before.  This is all simply a reflection of the still very limited level of our experience and understanding of these richest of all communities of life.

The GBR is not dying or even threatened.  Over its vastness, across its wide range of conditions and habitats, and amidst its endless diversity of dynamic interactions there are always times and places of detriment and decline along with a prevailing condition of luxuriant natural beauty and flourishing life. 

We see what we look for and look for what we wish to find.  Most visitors to the Reef find an overwhelming experience of natural beauty and flourishing life.  For a small, but noisy, minority of activists, academics, bureaucrats, and the legions of the righteous, threats to the Reef bestow a cornucopia of attention, funding and self-importance, along with a delicious sense of moral superiority.  They, too, see what they want to see.

Finding, promoting, investigating and pretending to “save” the Reef has become an attractive industry offering a permanent full-time, all-expense-paid Barrier Reef holidays with very modest duties, excellent job security and pension benefits.  There is now a whole  generation of Reef salvationists whose entire experience of the Reef has been focused on threats, leading them to perceive every fluctuation of nature as evidence of their fears. Although they profess to be terribly concerned about the threats, they take no hopeful interest in evidence anything may not be as dire as they persist in claiming. Their angry rejection of any suggestion that optimism is justified makes it appear the true commitment is more to hyping “threats” than it is to the Reef itself.

With war and pestilence running free in the world, crime and homelessness flourishing and spectres of famine and economic chaos flickering on the horizon, hysterical demands for vast increases in funding for hypothetical solutions to imaginary threats are beginning to look increasingly self-serving, irrelevant and grossly dishonest.

Walter Starck is a marine biologist and regular Quadrant contributor

5 comments
  • Peter Marriott

    Good informative piece Walter, thank you. Yourself, Jennifer Marohasy and Peter Ridd are the three I rely on to speak the scientific truth on the GBR , and due to the way academia seems to have been corrupted on this particular subject now……. the only three, apart from some older locals where I come from…… on the Burdekin, and of course we are not marine scientists.

  • Peter OBrien

    Great article, Walter. No-one has put it as succinctly and compellingly as you have here. I dive/snorkel on the GBR every year and my experience bears out what you say. Two years ago I dived on Heron Reef and have never seen it so healthy. Ditto in the northern sectors.

  • maxpart27

    I have assumed that the temperature changes will be up and remain up so all the polar caps melt and by 4576 seas have risen 20m and by 6026 60m, hence bye bye coastal cities. The glaciers in NZ have receded a lot in the past 30 years and I assume will disappear. The problem with the reef is not an Australian thing but a world thing. Morrison has poor advisors.

  • Botswana O’Hooligan

    Born in FNQ, swam and fished on the reef from the 1940’s onwards as a kid, was a commercial pilot and flew over it from DC3 days, flew it at low level day and night for GBRMPA in aircraft equipped with radar and SLAR (sideways looking radar) from about 1980 to mid 1985, we caught clam boats, long liners, did SAR, stuff like that, saw the coral spawn and the whole place covered with the orange sort of coloured spawn. Even thought of including GBRMPA people in the nightly devotions as in God bless them as one now includes that nice Victorian Mr. Andrews, for those poor folk had to endure Lizard Island conditions tourists paid a fortune to visit. The reef changes and recovers so one assumes that it has been quietly doing that forever but the GBRMPA authority won’t admit that.

  • Clive Bond

    Reef bleaching is put down to climate change these days and we are blamed for not stopping it. The following gives us the true science on ocean warming. The bleaching on the Barrier Reef happens predominately in the El Nino season when there is little cloud cover and more direct sunlight.

    http://21sci-tech.com/articles/ocean.html

    How the Oceans Get Warm
    Warming the ocean is not a simple matter, not like heating a small glass of water. The first thing to remember is that the ocean is not warmed by the overlying air.

    Let’s begin with radiant energy from two sources: sunlight, and infrared radiation, the latter emitted from the “greenhouse” gases (water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and various others) in the lower atmosphere. Sunlight penetrates the water surface readily, and directly heats the ocean up to a certain depth. Around 3 percent of the radiation from the Sun reaches a depth of about 100 meters.

    The top layer of the ocean to that depth warms up easily under sunlight. Below 100 meters, however, little radiant energy remains. The ocean becomes progressively darker and colder as the depth increases. (It is typical for the ocean temperature in Hawaii to be 26°C (78°F) at the surface, and 15°C (59°F) at a depth of 150 meters.

    The infrared radiation penetrates but a few millimeters into the ocean. This means that the greenhouse radiation from the atmosphere affects only the top few millimeters of the ocean. Water just a few centimeters deep receives none of the direct effect of the infrared thermal energy from the atmosphere! Further, it is in those top few millimeters in which evaporation takes places. So whatever infrared energy may reach the ocean as a result of the greenhouse effect is soon dissipated

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.