Bennelong Papers

An Open Letter to Cody Walker

Dear Cody and company,
Just in case all that praise and attention from the ABC, The Guardian and your sport’s politically correct hangers-on has gone to your head, let me try to tell you as honestly and kindly as I can what I think of your refusal to sing our National Anthem at the big game last night. I reckon that I might be speaking on behalf of the great majority of your fellow Australians in doing so.

Basically, you should be deeply embarrassed. You object to the phrase “we are young and free”; that is not something you want the nation in total to “let us rejoice”, as the lyric rather clumsily puts it.  On the contrary, you would rather we all stood po-faced, sullen and full of silent self-importance, as you did, when that part of the Anthem is sung .

Your argument for justifying such gross bad manners is that Aborigines have an old culture, rather than the Anthem’s “young” one, and that you are not or have never been “free”. What a crock of meretricious , shallow, unreflective posturing that ‘argument’ is. It suggests you have a complete incapacity to think for yourself.  How easily influenced and distracted you must be by the shallow attitudinising which passes for political discussion in mainstream and social media — and in the grievance subculture for which you have just made yourself the latest look-at-me poster child. A big, strong men you are without a doubt, yet so easily led and instructed by others.

Aborigines are an ancient people. But so are Britons and Greeks and Indians and many others who make up the Australian nation. Advance Australia Fair is a National Anthem. It is not a racial, ethnic or a tribal anthem. There are about 150 nations in the modern world, or so I counted when I last looked at the FIFA World Cup standings. Australia is no longer among the youngest but it was when the Commonwealth came in to existence and when the Anthem was compose. When we speak of the Australian people we are using that expression to identify those who live within it and who owe it loyalty and obligation, wherever they or their ancestors came from or, in your case, however long most of your forebears have lived here.

You may have grown confused by listening to those who want us to have a “treaty” between different kinds of Australians. They like to talk of Aboriginal peoples or “First Nations”. Despite the necessary use of the plural, they think that once the concept of “a people” is invoked all must defer to it, even when based squarely on racial profile.  As I put it in a recent Quadrant essay while addressing the Uluru Statement.

Aboriginal inhabitants of this continent were manifestly never part of a nation, as that word is understood in our language. After 230 years of settlement we still have no catalogue of these putative Aboriginal nations; no map delineating their boundaries; no specification of the criteria as to how one would qualify for “citizenship” in any such nation; and certainly no “constitution” for one. It seems clear to me that an Aboriginal “nation” would not be a strictly geographical entity, and that this must entail nationhood being interpreted in a racial sub-group sense instead.

Do you really want race to be a determinant of nationality, Cody? Did you and your mates think this through before last night’s ready-for-our-close-up grandstanding?

The nation in which the Australian people of all kinds live boasts political, legal, educational and economic infrastuctures of unimaginable complexity such as to facilitate astonishingly well-paid, well-nourished and much-feted athlete-celebrities whose physical prowess we celebrate, as was the case once more last night in millions of living rooms, pub bars and sports clubs. The sacrifices and hard work and patriotism which created a nation of such complexity and cohesion should be celebrated, surely, by all right-thinking Australians on such occasions? Yet all you can do is stand there and hog the spotlight of your empty, divisive gesture, the basis of which cannot withstand a moment’s scrutiny. How shameful for you and all others who rejected the very idea of Australia with that appalling silence .

You object also to the “free” part of the lyric as well? Well, Cody, freedom is a relative notion. In Australia, as in most former British colonies, our freedoms are grounded in the common law. They are essentially residual — that is, we are free to say and do what we want to do after we have done (or not done) what the law says we must (or must not). In this country, it is not to be found in a Bill of Rights or a Declaration of Independence or, with a few exceptions, expressed and implied, in our Constitution, yet  it allows us to live and speak remarkably free of constraint . You can choose to sing or not sing. I can say what I think about your choice. Neither of us suffer any legal penalties for that. When you can’t even bring yourself to mumble the word ‘free’, against  which nation’s standard are you comparing our own liberties? I am sorry to say I do not expect any explanation to be forthcoming, not from you or your mute teammates, and certainly not from the political or media types who encouraged you to make an exhibition of yourself. The caravan will simply move on to the next politically correct charade and its inevitable, attention-grabbing protests. You’ve had your 15 minutes.

The sad truth is that you could have made a meaningful and poignant point by singing the Anthem by refusing to use that particular word, free, on account of what has just happened to your Islander colleague in the other code, Israel Folau. Why wasn’t the issue of the denial of Izzy’s religious freedom the object of your grievance? Instead you drew attention to yourself at last night’s huge public event for  phony imagined grievances.

No answer, Cody? Your silence speaks volumes, most tellingly about yourself.


etc etc

10 thoughts on “An Open Letter to Cody Walker

  • Blair says:

    And rugby league (and rugby union and soccer etc) was founded by inhabitants of the same nation that invaded Australia.

  • padraic says:

    It’s a copy of the US situation. I did what the fans in America did – I did not watch the game.

  • en passant says:

    You say “I did not watch the game.”

    Was their some sort of game played last night?

  • Henry Rainger says:

    @ Blair, yes, the British colonised and named Australia and brought the aboriginals they found here out of the stone age..

    @ padraic, You did not watch the game? Would simply not watching these pathetic pretenders have been a better option?
    The only people who did not watch the game would be soccer fans.

    @ en passant, your attempt at sarcasm is noted, and dismissed.

  • en passant says:

    Soccer is a pathetic game for actors & falling down pretenders.
    What does this mean? “Would simply not watching these pathetic pretenders have been a better option?” Isn’t that what Padraic said?

  • padraic says:

    Just back from a weekend away from the computer. En passant, you were wise not to watch. The players were playing games all right, one with thirteen men per team and the other in a more figurative sense. Henry, I could not get your point about simply not watching these pathetic pretenders. That could only be achieved by not watching the game.

  • Multi Gaz says:

    Dear Stuart
    I am in complete agreement with your letter to Cody Walker. I would also suggest to ‘cc’ the letter to the others in both teams who participated in that distasteful and implicitly racist display.
    I wonder if Cody Woods thinks that history began when he was born? He claimed earlier in the week that a referendum is needed to select the National Anthem, becasue he never had a say in the matter. Does he not realise that the National Anthem was in fact selected by a referendum, or to be more accuarate, a plebiscite, since only constitutional matters can be resloved by referenderum?
    The irony should not be lost that Advance Australia Fair is actually older in our culture than the silly ‘welcome to country’ and smoking ceremonies that we must endure before every public event. The plebiscite to decide the National Anthem occurred in 1977, fully two years before actor Ernie Dingo invented the welcome to country and smoking ceremony in 1979. Going by orthodox indigenous virtue-signalling, because Advance Australia Fair came first, it invalidates the welcome to country ceremony.
    Perhaps those rugby players should reflect on their own character and behaviour before moralising on divisive issues like race.
    Israle Folau has earned my respect. Cody Walker et a. have lost it.

  • DUBBY says:

    Great comment Stuart. I don’t care whether Walker respects the flag or stands up or sits down; or kneels down for that matter. What was important the other night was how he played football; that’s why he was in the team. I’m with you. He’s had his fifteen minutes. Maloney and Cleary for mine.

  • Footslogger says:

    The Welcoming ceremonies are a disgrace, divisive and racist. Besides that whoever is conducting the event, needs to cough up the $$$$$$$$$ to pay for the experience. If these blokes were fair dinkum. They would stay in the sheds until the Anthems were over. These smoking ceremonies are a huge money grab. God Save the Queen.

  • Lawrie Ayres says:

    For real divisiveness I vote that ugly flag that must be flown on public buildings. We have an Australian flag which I cherish. We do not need the other unless of course our Aboriginal cousins are not part of Australia in which case they should not claim the attendant benefits either.

Leave a Reply