Welcome to Quadrant Online | Login/ Register Cart (0) $0 View Cart
Menu

Subscribe to Quadrant

Essential Reading

Hating Trump, loathing liberty

trump warsaw

Quadrant contributor and Hudson Institute senior fellow John Conte considers Donald Trump's recent speech in Warsaw (above) and the reaction it inspired in the political and chattering classes:

EU elites, Merkel, and their transnational progressive allies, are attempting to strip government by consent of the governed from the peoples of Central Europe and force new populations upon them without their consent.  This is a moral argument and Trump, the Poles, the Hungarians, the Slovaks and the Czechs are on the side of the angels—the side of “Philadelphian Sovereignty,” that is, the side of the republican principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States.

As Conte notes, Trump's words might just as easily have been those of other, more revered presidents. But that was then, not now:

The conceptual core of liberalism has been drastically altered since the halcyon days of FDR, Truman, and JFK. The reaction of mainstream 21st century liberalism to President Trump’s historic Warsaw speech clearly reveals what today’s progressives value and what they debase. Thus, the president’s speech (besides presenting a clear vision of democratic sovereignty and a broad understanding of what constitutes the West), has the added advantage of having flushed out, for all to see, what progressive liberals really think of the institutions and ideals that have for centuries been at the center of any decent society.

Conte's essay can be read in full via the link below.

Continue reading...

The Breakup of Australia

breakup ERAustralian voters are not being told the truth about the proposal for constitutional recognition of indigenous people. The goal of Aboriginal political activists today is to gain ‘sovereignty’ and create a black state, equivalent to the existing states. Its territory, com­prising all land defined as native title, will soon amount to more than 60% of the whole Australian continent.

As Keith Windschuttle observes in his new book -- available via the link below -- constitutional recognition would be its launching pad.

Continue reading...

Leadership?

big kevs bookUntil the BoM’s warmists have tickled their temperature readings and declared, as is inevitable, that the current winter was the hottest Melbourne has ever experienced, the chief source of heat in the City on the Yarra has been the friction between a Has Been and a Has Excuses. That’s ex-premier Jeff Kennett in the former instance and Ms Christine Nixon, once Victoria’s police commissioner, in the latter.

The catalyst for this discord has been Ms Nixon’s new book Women Leading, in the course of whose promotion she has accused Mr Kennett of sexism and misogyny. Given that we haven’t had a good AFL scandal for at least a week, this contretemps is keeping Melbourne entertained, not least for its irony.

It was only recently that Kennett elevated Ms Julia Gillard to head Beyond Blue, the mental-health charity he led until April. As the ex-Prime Minister blamed the patriarchy for the world’s failure to recognise the magnificence of her achievements in office, it cannot be said that attempting to obscure incompetence behind the clutched straws of feminist victimology is a foible to which he takes particular exception. Yet Ms Nixon, who has failed upward and into a deputy-chancellor’s gig at Monash University, brands him one of her testosterone-poisoned tormentors.

“I have been a very strong critic of hers since the [Black Saturday] bushfires, for what I consider to be a desertion of her post,” Mr Kennett told The Australian.

“It was unforgivable, it remain­s unforgivable.

“That she is now giving lectures­ on leadership I find an absolute affront.”

On that February day in 2009 when Victoria burned and 173 lives were lost, Ms Nixon was the state’s most senior emergency official. In that capacity she fought the inferno by having her hair done, chatting about her accomplishments with a biographer and, as Marysville and some 36 of its residents were consumed by a fireball, enjoying a stylish meal at an inner-city gastro pub. As the Royal Commission into the bushfire disaster observed, she received no calls during that time from her subordinates at the control centre, presumably because they realised it would be a waste of time seeking leadership from someone preoccupied with shepherd’s pie.

Yet somehow, by Ms Nixon’s reckoning, all criticism of her conduct on that dreadful day is denominated by sexist chauvinism. Give her points, though, for sticking to the gendered narrative because she acknowledged Kennett’s “missing in action” slam only to the extent that it provided an excuse to push a favourite barrow.

“She called for gender quotas to be more widely adopted,” The Australian reports, “saying women were still not allowed into senior management roles.”

Alas that one particular woman had been denied a “senior management role” on Black Saturday. As the Royal Commission put it,

“The Commission considers that Ms Nixon’s approach to emergency coordination was inadequate. Ms Nixon herself acknowledged that leaving the integrated Emergency Coordination Centre and going home at about 6.00 pm on 7 February was an error of judgment. The Commission shares this view.”

Ms Nixon’s latest book is titled Women Leading. What chance the next tome off the Nixon rank will be 'Brazen'?

The Royal Commission's thoughts on the sad performance of Victoria's public guardians on Black Saturday can be read via the link below.

- roger franklin

 

Continue reading...


Shop