Welcome to Quadrant Online | Login/ Register Cart (0) $0 View Cart
Menu

Subscribe to Quadrant

Essential Reading

Right to know? Phooey!

acl bomb vanNature abhors a vacuum and, once upon a time, journalism did too. Alas no longer, or so one gathers from the way an event that unfolded late of a Canberra evening a little over a month ago has been allowed to slide quietly down the memory hole.

Perhaps your memory is sharper than authorities might wish and you can still recall the incident, which made front pages from Cronulla to Cottesloe: a car loaded with gas cylinders rammed the headquarters of the Australian Christian Lobby and exploded when the driver struck a match. We we must assume it was a match, as details of his ignition system, like so many other still-veiled aspects of the case, have been withheld from public consumption by authorities  honouring the public's right to know mostly in the breach.

Who is this midnight bomber? We don't know because the ACT police refuse to release his name and details.

How did the grievously burned bomber stroll unnoticed 5kms through the national capital when its streets were abuzz with police cars and emergency vehicles, all dashing about in response to the explosion? A badly burned man in tattered, smoking rags attracted no attention? How could this be?

And most intriguing -- although not, apparently, to the editors of the Canberra Times, or any other mainstream news organ for that matter -- what was the bomber's motive?

Some weeks ago now, Quadrant Online placed a call to the ACT wallopers in search of a few basic facts. The conversation with Canberra's Finest, which isn't saying much, went more or less like this:

QoL: Hi, I want some info on the ACL bomber.

Plod: What do want to know?

QoL: His name would be good.

Plod: That's not being released.

QoL: Hang on, a lunatic, or maybe a fanatic, ignites a huge bomb in the heart of the national capital, destroys the office of a conservative political organisation and you're telling me the public doesn't need to know the who and why! You're joking right?

Plod: No, I'm not. We don't release names until the individual is interviewed and charged. He's fighting for his life in hospital so we can't interview him.

QoL: But you have interviewed him. The very next morning your mob said he had been quizzed and a firm determination made that the incident had nothing to do with terrorism.

Plod: But that wasn't a formal interview. Only formal interviews can lead to charges being laid and names released.

QoL: Surely you realise the mystery surrounding this case is spawning fresh speculation, especially on the internet.

Plod: So?

QoL: Well some are saying he's a an over-enthusiastic gay activist, others that his name is Mohammad...

Plod: So what if he's called Mohammad, why would that matter?

The conversation ended soon after, before the officer could volunteer his name. In view of his final comment it is safe to assume he goes by something other than 'Sherlock'.

QoL, a small news organisation, lacks the journalistic resources to keep digging, especially as the bomber has since been transferrred to the burns unit at Sydney's Concord Hospital, which is on the SMH home turf (if you accept that its reporters sometimes venture further from the CBD than Newtown).

Why hasn't the SMH Chief of Staff instructed a reporter to buy a bunch of flowers and wander the hospital corridors, posing as a lost visitor and trying, gently, to see what he or she can learn?

Why hasn't a reporter hung out with nurses in the smokers-only area outside and done likewise?

Why haven't contacts been tapped in the Health Department and minister's office, the motivation being that it is unconscionable for police to draw their blackout curtains about the identity and motivation of a man who has been -- and there can be no disguising this -- a lethal threat to life and the cause of immense damage to property?

One can speculate about the reasons a police force might be at pains to conceal such details -- indeed one can do no more than speculate due to the pointed absence of official guidance.  It could be, for example, entirely self-serving: departmental brass might not wish to acknowledge that inadequate tabs were kept on a known peril to public safety. If so, while reprehensible, the bureaucratic instinct to protect turf, budget and careers would be entirely understandable.

But there can be no understanding why the Fourth Estate has turned a blind eye to the events of that shattered Thursday night before Christmas. Actually, that's wrong, for while there can be no excuse, there is an explanation: our mainstream media organisations are craven, spineless, incurious, easily cowed and, worst of all, infected with a cur's yearning to roll over before authority, rather than bite it and bite it hard.

At the link below, a Miranda Devine column from several weeks go that poses many of the same questions. Her curiosity has not been satisfied; no one's has. What a disgrace.

-- roger franklin

Continue reading...

New Australian's new Australia

saba and leePeter O'Brien writes: Have you heard of Saba Vasefi? That's her (above) at the Woman Scream Festival with the Greens' Lee Rhianon, and there was more in the Sunday Telegraph, which profiled her in an Australia Day lift-out beneath the following headline:

Ambassador of hope --This citizen of the world calls Australia her home

It seems Ms Vasefi fled Iran in 2010 after being sacked from her university post because she opposes capital punishment. She arrived in Australia with her daughter, a suitcase and not much else. But now, according to the Tele, she has ‘firmly established herself as a valued member of society.  So much so, she has been named as an Australia Day ambassador’.

A multicultural success story? Yes, but only so far, as Ms Vasefi has a few reservations about the country that took her in, which is perhaps to be expected of someone described as a feminist film maker, academic, poet and PhD student in Feminist Cinema Studies and documentary film at Macquarie University. Once, in a less enlightened age, new arrivals on our shores built useful things like, you know, the Snowy Mountains Scheme, but that was then. As she told the Telegraph of her Australia Day ambassadorship (emphasis added):

I was totally surprised when they asked me to do it because so much of the conversation in Australian society vilifies refugees.

And it’s obvious that what I have to say will be uncomfortable for many to hear and will challenge the views held by many. But I was so honoured to be named an Australia Day ambassador.

But a part of her still feels restless:

While I do identify with Australia I have a sense of belonging in several places such as the community of displaced and friends who support love, peace, equality and justice.  So I identify myself as a citizen of the world.

If Saba had been here a little longer, or perhaps if she looked beyond the grievance-industrial complex of universities and advocacy groups, she might have grasped that the vast majority of Australians welcome genuine refugees and have done so since the end of World War Two. Her own life here might also have provided a clue. Australia has been very kind to her, although she seems not to be entirely aware of her good fortune. In March last year she said:

After five years living in Australia as a refugee, I still feel I don't belong here somehow.

My continuing search made me reach out to asylum seekers living in detention and drove me to work for the powerless women and children incarcerated there.

There are dozens of these Australia Day ambassadors.  The idea is that they go out and celebrate Australia Day with local communities.  Saba will be heading to Tamworth, where she will no doubt be able to provide the locals with a more nuanced view of what it is to be an Aussie.

As to her own experience of the ‘vilification of refugees’, the following excerpts are revealing:

In 2014, I was accepted to study at the Australian Film, Television and Radio School. I was determined to pursue filmmaking, but it was clear the curriculum lacked cultural awareness, particularly regarding students from refugee or non-English speaking backgrounds. A lot of work needs to be done to encourage diversity at all levels of education in Australia and teaching methods desperately need to be revised to promote a more sophisticated multicultural vision.

I had access to generous funding on the condition I produced a documentary film about a landmark event from Australian history. I had no knowledge of Australian history and I wanted to find a story that resonated with my own narrative. After spending years campaigning against capital punishment in Iran, I hoped I might find Australian women dedicated to the same cause. This is what led me to Edith Cowan. 

Edith Cowan, Australia's first female parliamentarian, does have a link of sorts to capital punishment: her father was hanged in 1876 for shooting her stepmother. Ms Vasefi's daughter, Minerva, would be aware of that, as she attends a very good school, Tara in Sydney’s west, on a full academic and musical scholarship.

So, "generous funding" to make a film, honoured by the Australia Day crowd and a full scholarship for her daughter.

Yep, it's a tough life for poor Ms Vasefi. Those Tamworth rednecks must be just itching to have Australia's shortcomings brought to their attention.

For 2017's Australian of the Year finalists, follow the link below.

Continue reading...

Girls' Day Out

museum stepsWhat do women want?

To impede the smooth flow of traffic, if one is to go by the globe-girdling agitation of ladies who don't much approve of the latest US President or, for that matter, the result of elections that fail to produce the result they anticipated.

Yesterday in Melbourne, where outpourings of local feminist sentiment can be murkier than the Yarra, the crusader in blue took her male along to join in the fun. No doubt he enjoyed the outing, especially the heavy lifting of those weighty issues on his half of two signs extolling the correct positions on a number of fashionable topics. The photo also perhaps explains why it can sometimes be rather hard to stay on top of the latest trends in feminist discourse.

Surprisingly, if women are to be free, it seems capping CO2 emissions is a vital first step; likewise, all who aspire to enlightenment must scoff at any link between Islam and frequent outbreaks of mass murder -- a conclusion only those silly enough to favour an afternoon at the beach over marching and chanting would ever be likely to entertain. They are the same people, just by the way, who might well regard the veiling of women, child marriage, arranged marriage, consanguineous marriage, genital mutilation and the scripturally ordained second-rate status of women as symptoms of a true patriarchy. Feminists, of course, know better.

And don't forget that sexuality is not a choice -- handy advice if troubled by a sudden interest in bicycle seats or, for that matter, an eagerness to parade as 50% of what many might regard as a humiliating public exercise in cognitive dissonance. "Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored," proclaims Madam's placard, complete with an erudite attribution to Aldous Huxley, who penned that thought in A Note on Dogma. To be fair, she could not have squeezed too many more words on that single sheet of cardboard and must therefore be granted the benefit of the doubt for not sampling another relevant quote. It is in Huxley's letter of congratulation to George Orwell upon the publication of 1984.

... I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience.

Infant conditioning? Narco-hypnosis? Why, it brings to mind Ritalin time with Matron after a Safe Schools class!

For more on the International Day of Female Fury in Comfy Shoes, follow the link below, where another strange discordance is in evidence. When Donald Trump is surreptitiously recorded saying something vulgar in private, he is to be roundly condemned. But it's entirely different when feminist heroine Madonna speaks of yearning to blow up the White House and urges her new president to go suck a .... well, just follow the link. At Quadrant Online we leave such language to the ladies.

-- roger franklin

Continue reading...


Shop