Doomed Planet

A Lobbyist’s Notion of a Think Tank

It’s difficult to conceive of a more inauspicious start for a think tank than being birthed by lobbyists. Yet such an unfortunate creature appears to have sprawled forth, mewling onto the Australian political landscape in the form of the Blueprint Institute.

With no publicly available detail regarding its funding, we are left to speculate as to the identity of its financial backers. Funding for think tanks is difficult to come by in the best of times, and even more so in the current economic environment. Who would possibly be public spirited enough to endow a brains trust to lead Australia out of its current policy malaise?

Luckily for the benighted public there are plenty of clues in the personnel manifest of these new champions of the public interest. Co-founder and co-board chair, Ian Hancock, is the managing director at PremierState and PremierNation, the former lobbying firm of New South Wales political operative Michael Photios.

Appearing on the “Strategic Council” of the Blueprint Institute is none other than the beneficent Photios himself. The fact he is the chairman of PremierState earns scant mention but that’s small beer. Photios, one might gather, is a patron saint of the common good.

The PremierState connections run deep. Co-founder and Board Chair, Lachlan Crombie, is the Director of Government Relations at PremierState and PremierNational and one of their analysts appears on the staff roster as a researcher. The only staff member among the senior management with executive responsibilities is founder and CEO Harry McGuiness, a former adviser to the foreign minister in the failed Turnbull Government, Julie Bishop.

Festooned around the rest of the “core team” are former staffers to moderate Liberal members, former state-level parliamentarians few people would recognise and, notably, very few actual boots on the ground to do the hard yards of what a traditionalist might refer to as real work. All of which leaves me wondering what it’s all about.

Appearing alongside Photios on the Board as political window dressing are: ex-senator Robert Hill, Christopher Pyne, Bruce Baird, academic Richard Holden and CEO of ClimateWorks Australia Anna Skarbek, once an adviser to Victoria’s then-deputy Labor premier John Thwaites.

Upon its launch earlier this month, the Blueprint Institute was billed as a think tank for moderate Liberals, which feels self-defeating because it’s not entirely clear Liberal Party moderates stand for anything. Surely it would be easier just to link their website to opinion polls and the views of focus groups.

Blueprint’s website is plastered with the sort of motherhood statements one would expect from a politically anodyne organisation. These principles include: being optimistic, evidence-based, open-minded and forward thinking; probably because it seldom makes sense to be pessimistic, closed-minded and backward thinking while ignoring evidence.

Amazingly, Blueprint also bills itself as independent, claiming it will “advocate for policies that create a more prosperous and liveable Australia without being beholden to funders, political parties or corporations”. But there’s nothing on that short-list of nefarious corruptors about lobbyists, which brought to a head something that’s been nagging at me: how can a think tank that claims to be independent, be managed and thickly salted with lobbyists whose very job description is to advocate policies beloved by their clients?

To me that suggests an inherent conflict of interest, as lobbyists are not exactly ideal candidates to be economic reformers.

Blueprint, we were informed, is planning on releasing two papers later in the month, one on red tape for small business and the other on the opportunity to make “progress” on energy and climate policy. This is the point at which my suspicion went into overdrive.

Ian Hancock is also the co-founder and director of Clean Energy Strategies, and along with fellow directors Michael Photios and his wife, Kristina, runs a business that is proud to proclaim having worked with “former US vice-president Al Gore and his team during his special purpose energy and climate Australia tour.”

Even more egregious is PremierNation’s client list, available on the Commonwealth Lobbyist Register, which includes: renewable energy generators, Genex Power; solar project developers ib vogt; a peak body for the solar energy, the Smart Energy Council; the Australian Solar Energy Society and anti-fossil fuels activists at the Sunrise Project. PremierState’s NSW clients are even more numerous and similarly riddled with rent-seekers from the renewable energy sector, plus activists determined to annihilate the fossil fuels sector.

Throw in the current NSW Parliamentary Secretary for the Environment, James Griffin and Anna Skarbek’s presence on the Board, and it strikes me as looking hopelessly conflicted, a front for pushing renewable energy interests.

We didn’t have to wait long for Blueprint’s first “research report”. It’s polling data, naturally, that points out that “88 per cent of Australians (94% Labor and 79% Coalition voters) would support investment in renewables to promote post-COVID recovery (as opposed to fossil fuels)”. Then there is this:

73% of Australians agreed that a strong economy is not important without a healthy environment (Labor 77%; Coalition 61%)

Sure, there’s some insubstantial pap about the role of National Cabinet, productivity and small business but the main event here is telegraphing that the Blueprint Institute

will argue in subsequent papers that we can grow our economy, futureproof key industries, and restore our environment by seizing a share of global markets for clean technology and low-emissions exports.

Calling the Blueprint Institute “a think tank”, as did The Australian, is to put lipstick on a pig.

Burchell Wilson is a consulting economist with Freshwater Economics

6 thoughts on “A Lobbyist’s Notion of a Think Tank

  • ianl says:

    > ” … moderate Liberal members”

    Not “moderates”, but committed gooey-wet lefties. Perhaps with a good deal of speculative money invested in windmills.

  • Doubting Thomas says:

    I absolutely agree, ianl. For journalists to refer to a known member of the Liberal Party as a Liberal, is simply to state something that is an objective fact. To add the word “moderate” is to reduce the quality of the information to mere opinion, and a very ignorantly biassed one at that. And, knowing the obvious bias of those journalists who use the term “moderate Liberal members”, invariably with approval, one must conclude that the individuals concerned must indeed be “committed gooey-wet lefties” who have brought a once effective if not always great party to its present shambolic state.

  • Michael says:

    Just what we need to drag us out of the Covid Doldrums.
    More flagrant job and economy-destroying green left energy fantasies.
    Follow the money re this crew, I say.

  • Michael says:

    Hah! Once again, forgot, above written by Elizabeth Beare, Michael’s wife.

  • padraic says:

    I think your fears are well founded Burchell. I noticed on TV the other night a senior NSW Liberal politician indicating that there may be some more delays in getting the Narrabri gas project actually happening. This would be an enormous betrayal of those industries and households on the East Coast seeking a cheap and reliable source of gas. I am not surprised that current NSW Parliamentary Secretary for the Environment is on the Board. The neutrality of the Public Service across all governments is suspect. In addition, I was always under the impression that in a democracy the people voted in a government on the basis of their party policies. What we are seeing more and more these days is governments creating unelected bodies outside the Public Service whom they can blame for doing the opposite to what they promised the electorate. We have been heartened by comments from the Feds how red and green tape will be scaled back after Covid so Australian industry can take off and create jobs. The above article paints a bleak picture leading to what actually might happen.

  • Peter Sandery says:

    To my senile brain, the cranking up of this “Think Tank” of propagandists indicates that the Photios Clique of the New South Wales Liberal party is getting more then somewhat concerned at the traction the Institute of Public Affairs is having on commentary at the moment. Perhaps I am wrong though.

Leave a Reply