Welcome to Quadrant Online | Login/ Register Cart (0) $0 View Cart
Menu
April 20th 2016 print

Michael Galak

The Veiled Fate of Europe

Police, ambulance and fire brigades are not game to enter Islamicised enclaves in France, Germany, Belgium – just about everywhere, in fact, where welfare payments and crime underwrite the aggressive separatism of communities openly contemptuous of their Western benefactors

crescent tower IICroissant pouvre is a French term for the suburbs least likely to be settled by the European middle classes. Translated literally, it means ‘poor crescent’. This description has nothing to do with the perennial breakfast favourite — it is a word-play on the origin and favoured symbol of the majority of residents in these suburbs.  Paris, Brussels, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Berlin – most large European cities have these ‘no-go’ areas, which also have another description – ‘zones sans-droit’: zones without law.  Simply put, the law of the land does not apply. Instead, Sharia is firmly in control. France has about 30 zones sans-droit, all of which share three three characteristics.

  • all are largely populated by the unemployed, unemployable and un-integrated Muslim migrants from Africa and the Middle East and their descendants;
  • all are blighted by organised crime, with the narcotics trade, associated violence and prostitution dominate the civic landscape;
  • all have connections with, and supply, the recruits for jihadi activities overseas and terrorism at home, being a shelter, safe haven and breeding ground for organised crime and politically motivated terror.

The previous non-migrant, non-Muslim residents have mostly been squeezed out by threats, implied or real violence, intimidation, crime and plummeting property values. With few exceptions, shops operated by Jewish or Christian owners had closed their doors by 2013. Non-Muslim women, not wearing street clothes in accordance with the Sharia law, are routinely and openly accosted, insulted and manhandled by the self-proclaimed Sharia patrols or Islamic purity enthusiasts. The generous social security benefits paid to the residents of these suburbs are regarded as Jizziya – a head tax on dhimmis. These benefits are treated  as an entitlement. This approach helps resolve the theological conundrum, which states that Muslims should not live in lands ruled by non-Muslims. Being paid Jizziya establishes the hierarchy of primacy and subjugation, justifies the contempt and disregard towards local laws and customs and supports the notion that the present situation is a transition towards full control.

burqa passportLocal police, ambulance and fire brigades are not game to enter – if they do, the likely outcome is violence or, at best, intimidation and contempt. The French police have a long-standing non-written arrangement with these areas’ crime leaders not to disturb their activities within the specified areas in exchange for the containment of illegal activities outside. This has not worked, as you will read below.

These areas of Europe have an acknowledged pool of the ‘international terror’s’ sympathisers, activists, recruiters and practitioners, which can offer help and succour in time of need.  Germany, Belgium, Scandinavian and other Western European countries face similar problems. Molenbeek, Forest and Schaerbeek in Brussels, Saint Denis in Paris, Neukolln in Berlin, Rinkeby and Husby in Stockholm, Tingbjerg in Copenhagen – all  are now centres of organised crime as well as the havens for the perpetrators of recent terrorist outrages in Europe.

Molenbeek – Europe’s jihadi base.

The dysfunctional system of Belgian governance has virtually encouraged Molenbeek to became a kasbah in the centre of this European city. Belgium has six governments and Brussels, its capital, has 19 mayors. The security forces are fragmented and compete with one another. Sharing of information between them is unlawful.  Infamously, these defenders of the law cannot disturb terror suspects after the certain time at night, lest they be traumatised after the hate-filled day’s work. Add the impossibility of profiling suspects according to their place of birth, origin of their families or religion and it becomes easy to understand why the Molenbeek, Schaerbeek and Forest areas of Brussels have become a haven for terrorists and their sympathisers. Suffice to mention, that one of the perpetrators of the November, 2015, Paris outrage, Salah Abdislam, was hiding in Molenbeek. The perpetrators of the latest Brussels airport atrocity had prepared for their deed in Schaerbeek and departed from there to blow up the Brussels airport in the name of Islamic glory.

How did it happen?

How did peaceful, prosperous and politically correct Europe become a battleground with recurrent outrages perpetrated in the name of Islam? It started with the unwillingness of the locals to do manual work. To fill unpopular jobs, thousands of ‘guest-workers’ were imported in the Sixties from the countries of the Maghreb, the Middle East and Africa. These people were largely employed until 1980 when an economic downturn put a stop to full employment. They were housed in cheap accommodation, the equivalent of Housing Commission flats in Australia. woman's islamic gauntletHowever, the initial work enthusiasm of the new arrivals had evaporated. They realised the combination of generous social security payments and the profits of the narcotics trade beat the hell out of sweeping Paris boulevards in the middle of the night. Soon, the croissant pouvre areas were ruled by ethnic gangs, which instilled an atmosphere of secrecy, confrontation with authorities, continuous violence and extensive links with criminal and terror organisations at home and abroad. Needless to say, some of these migrants’ only hope for income was to work for organised crime. With time, these no-go areas were transformed into zones sans-droit. In order to maintain civic peace, the French police have had a non-written ‘understanding’ with the criminal leaders of the troublesome Saint Denis and Clichy-sous-Bois banlieues, promising non-interference with their activities.

However, when two young drug dealers, fleeing with police in hot pursuit in 2005, hid from the police in the suburban electric substation and were electrocuted as a result, Saint Denis and Clichy-sous-Bois erupted in a mass riot. It ended with hundreds of cars torched, shops looted and automatic-teller machines burgled. Order was restored only several days later, when the French authorities were forced to use water cannon and rubber bullets against rocks and Molotov cocktails. Two years later, in 2007, a police car collided with the motorcycle ridden by two immigrant teenagers. The gendarmes walked off without calling an ambulance. An angry mob attacked two police stations and dozens of police officers were wounded by firearms. This dangerous progression marked an escalation of the confrontation level between the largely immigrant, angry mob and the European forces of law and order.

Terra incognita

The areas of compact immigrant settlement are virtually a terra incognita for authorities, because they are ruled, in effect, by organised crime.  Such structures are ideally suited for the purposes of terrorist organisations, such as ISIS, which has ready-made access to recruits, safe houses, material, plus spiritual and logistical support. Due to the overwhelming majority of residents in these areas being Muslim, Islamic terrorists can dissolve within the benevolent and ideologically close community, becoming urban guerrillas.

It is an open secret that the local underground has a well-established connection with their ‘colleagues’ in other countries. According to unconfirmed data, there are about 250,000 people, living in such areas in Belgium alone. In the last 20 years the population there has increased by a third. Half of the residents are younger than 35. After the recent influx of Middle Eastern and African refugees, the numbers, unsurprisingly, are expected to rise and by a considerable margin. Judging by previous history, new arrivals’ ability and willingness to integrate will not be great. Indeed, to say it is likely to be negligible is apt to be a considerable understatement. To put it  bluntly, the ability and willingness of the residents of these areas to integrate into Western culture and mindset is zilch.

Today, France and Belgium. Tomorrow, everywhere.

Zones sans droit do not exist only in Belgium and France.

In Stockholm it is a “Little Mogadishu” – the name given by the locals to Rinkeby, which has a 90% immigrant population.  Rinkeby got its nickname because of the large Somalian diaspora, which had chosen to settle in this part of Stockholm. Pogroms against native Swedes, regarded as interlopers in their own land, are common [   1] ;  confrontations with the police depressingly regular. Police now avoid this area.

In Copenhagen it is Tingbjerg, a previously nondescript neighbourhood which has gradually became a predominantly Muslim area. Ethnic Danes are leaving at the first opportunity; an openly gay pastor of the local church has fled after the years of being harassed by Muslim youth. In October, 2011, local Salafists declared that Sharia would henceforth prevail in Tingbjerg.

Berlin has its own problem area, Neukolln, regarded as the most troubled and crime-ridden area of this sophisticated and vibrant city. A quarter of its inhabitants subsist below the poverty line, preferring to live on Social Security payments and dabble in crime. Neukolln, with 10% of Berlin’s population, produces 20% of all Berlin crime. In order to provide security for local children, police officers are stationed in Neukolln schools. Police are also stationed at the doors of Berlin’s Jewish organisations. Whenever there is a search for the Islamists, police look first to Neukolln.

If this had been the limit of such immigrant activities, I doubt very much that anyone would have objected strenuously, except in cases of intimidation and blackmail. The trouble is that, judging by the European experience, these areas are fast becoming grey areas of inter-proliferation between organised crime and political terrorism. I believe that the situation described here has serious implications for Australia. I hope that our politicians will make immigration choices which will spare Australia the fate which seems to be  Europe’s destiny.

Sources:

1. HRS – “Human rights service” – “Tingbjerg: one neighbourhood’s nightmare” – undated.

2. Lenta.RU – ‘Regions, city blocks of terror” – 24.03.2016

3. International New York Times, “Belgium on high alert and in mourning”, 24.3.2016.

4. Politico, -  “Molenbeek broke my heart” -11/21/2015

 

Comments [8]

  1. Lawrie Ayres says:

    Shorten will open the floodgates if elected on July 2. A few thousand Muslim votes is more important to Bill than the safety of Australian citizens. The ALP is all about power but then so is Malcolm.

    • Davidovich says:

      Sadly, but so too will Turnbull open the floodgates if the Government is re-elected. The ALP will be more immediately disastrous but Turnbull will be close behind.

  2. pgang says:

    “an openly gay pastor of the local church has fled…” So they obviously had seriously degenerate problems before the immigrants arrived. Was there a cohesive society to begin with?

  3. Ian MacDougall says:

    Unchecked Muslim immigration without integration opens the way to enormous social problems. As I see it, integration can only begin if all children have much the same education: leaving no room for the deliberate inculcation of ideas of social superiority, of ‘believers’ being superior to ‘unbelievers’ and similar garbage. (Problems here for all forms of religious education, but none that cannot be overcome.)
    Otherwise, it looks as if the period of liberal democracy ushered in with the English and French revolutions of the 17th and 18th centuries will give way before a revival of feudal gangsterism: in perpetual turf wars while espousing the glories of the coming world caliphate.

    • acarroll says:

      The only way to guarantee your brainwashing program (for that’s what it is) could work — and it’s extremely doubtful — is if you separated these children from their families and culture and raised them as if they were natives, a la the so-called stolen generations.

      Otherwise, kids can (and do) freely switch off to whatever rubbish you would be force feeding them, and get their indoctrination from home.

      These communities will never fully integrate. Europe has imported an economic underclass, a slave class. They may culturally assimilate but they come from countries in which Europeans standards of governance and social cooperation are impossible, indeed probably beyond their average mental capability.

  4. acarroll says:

    Michael,

    Do you have references to back up the claim that “It started with the unwillingness of the locals to do manual work”?

    My understanding is that it wasn’t a lack of willingness, it was

    1) a lack of manpower which
    2) lead to wage inflation, solved by
    3) importing thousands of very cheap labourers from North Africa and Turkey, facilitated by
    4) bought politicians and well funded anti-racist/anti-nationalist organisations (including the EC and EU) who’ve worked tirelessly to suppress any reaction from the native peoples.

    i.e. the problem was created by the business elites who wanted cheap labour. Just like bankers after the 2008 GFC they’ve privatised the profits and socialised the losses, the loss in this case being the European homelands to future generations of indigenous Europeans.

    Capitalism may be a very successful system to grow the economy but it doesn’t protect against social costs such as these.

    • gardner.peter.d says:

      I can suggest that cheap labour is a key factor in Britain because of the right of people from EU states to live and work there, no questions asked and regardless of criminality. People from countries with an average wage on a par with the minimum wage in Britain obviously choose to go to Britain if they can. Add to that Britain’s uniquely generous state benefits which can be sent home to where they buy far more than in Britain and the incentives are very great. Britain will be sucked into the EU’s distribution of Muslim migrants whether it likes it or not. In any case nearly all these migrants will either gain EU passports within 3-5 years or move illegally. The UN convention on Refugees requires host countries to grant similar rights of movement to refugees as its own citizens.
      In Britain the prisons are a breeding ground for Islamic terrorism. The Government has facilitated visits by Imams who preach radical Islam, the muslims in prison run their own ‘communities’ within the prisons, and, as in other EU countries, the prison population is disproportionately Muslim.
      Sharia law is tolerated in Britain although increasing public concern has now forced the Government to launch an enquiry.
      High rates of unrestricted immigration on low wages are now attracting even highly educated people from the EU to Britain to take on low paid work, by British standards. Employers, especially large corporates, welcome it and have little or no regard to the social consequences. Well-off families like cheap labour because they can then have maids, butlers, servants, nannies. If you can hire a Bosnian Muslim PhD for the price of a street cleaner why would you not? Especially when discriminating on grounds of religion is illegal and discrimination on grounds of nationality is mandatory.
      Then there is the question of birth rate. etc etc.

  5. gardner.peter.d says:

    I would like to read Michael Galak’s assessment of Britain. It too has serious problems of parallel Muslim societies.